Post Reply 
35s label-less programming - so close yet so far
10-10-2019, 09:39 PM (This post was last modified: 10-11-2019 01:29 PM by David Hayden.)
Post: #1
35s label-less programming - so close yet so far
[ Edited to say GTO/XEQ lines are NOT adjusted properly. Dang - the one word I skipped is the key to the entire post! Thanks ijabbott for pointing out my error.]

The 35s GTO and XEQ instruction lets you go to any line number within a label. Whenever you insert or delete a program line, the calculator is supposed to adjust the GTO & XEQ instructions accordingly. If you delete the target of a GTO/XEQ, the GTO/XEQ remains unchanged, meaning that the new target is the line after the deleted line, which now occupies the deleted line's former spot.

If this worked properly, then label-less programming would be easy and pretty cool:
  • write your code using labels A-Z as you would on many other RPN calcs.
  • When you're program works, just delete the LBL lines! GTO/XEQ instructions that went to the label would now go to the instruction that followed it.
Alas, there's a known bug: if you delete a LBL line, the GTO/XEQ lines are not adjusted properly.

Sigh. This would have been very cool if it worked right. You could just reserve a bunch of labels for development work and delete them when your program is okay.

So close, yet so far.

Dave
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
10-11-2019, 09:07 AM
Post: #2
RE: 35s label-less programming - so close yet so far
(10-10-2019 09:39 PM)David Hayden Wrote:  Alas, there's a known bug: if you delete a LBL line, the GTO/XEQ lines are adjusted properly.

Not?

— Ian Abbott
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
10-11-2019, 01:26 PM
Post: #3
RE: 35s label-less programming - so close yet so far
(10-11-2019 09:07 AM)ijabbott Wrote:  
(10-10-2019 09:39 PM)David Hayden Wrote:  Alas, there's a known bug: if you delete a LBL line, the GTO/XEQ lines are adjusted properly.

Not?
Correct! I'll edit my post. Thanks for pointing that out.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)