35s label-less programming - so close yet so far
|
10-10-2019, 09:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-11-2019 01:29 PM by David Hayden.)
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
35s label-less programming - so close yet so far
[ Edited to say GTO/XEQ lines are NOT adjusted properly. Dang - the one word I skipped is the key to the entire post! Thanks ijabbott for pointing out my error.]
The 35s GTO and XEQ instruction lets you go to any line number within a label. Whenever you insert or delete a program line, the calculator is supposed to adjust the GTO & XEQ instructions accordingly. If you delete the target of a GTO/XEQ, the GTO/XEQ remains unchanged, meaning that the new target is the line after the deleted line, which now occupies the deleted line's former spot. If this worked properly, then label-less programming would be easy and pretty cool:
Sigh. This would have been very cool if it worked right. You could just reserve a bunch of labels for development work and delete them when your program is okay. So close, yet so far. Dave |
|||
10-11-2019, 09:07 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: 35s label-less programming - so close yet so far
(10-10-2019 09:39 PM)David Hayden Wrote: Alas, there's a known bug: if you delete a LBL line, the GTO/XEQ lines are adjusted properly. Not? — Ian Abbott |
|||
10-11-2019, 01:26 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: 35s label-less programming - so close yet so far | |||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)