Hmmmmm
|
11-01-2014, 08:50 AM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Hmmmmm | |||
11-01-2014, 09:32 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Hmmmmm | |||
11-01-2014, 09:50 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Hmmmmm
And I didn't think of it as vintage already...
Greetings, Massimo -+×÷ ↔ left is right and right is wrong |
|||
11-01-2014, 05:21 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Hmmmmm
(11-01-2014 09:50 AM)Massimo Gnerucci Wrote: And I didn't think of it as vintage already... Exactly! This listing has been around many weeks and I think the word vintage in the description was not in original listing. So, maybe it's a reference to the listing, rather than the machine --Bob Prosperi |
|||
11-01-2014, 05:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2014 05:34 PM by Massimo Gnerucci.)
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Hmmmmm
(11-01-2014 05:21 PM)rprosperi Wrote: So, maybe it's a reference to the listing, rather than the machine Probably so! ahahah Greetings, Massimo -+×÷ ↔ left is right and right is wrong |
|||
11-03-2014, 08:27 PM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Hmmmmm
(11-01-2014 05:21 PM)rprosperi Wrote:(11-01-2014 09:50 AM)Massimo Gnerucci Wrote: And I didn't think of it as vintage already... It's on eBay therefore the word 'vintage' is mandatory in any calc listing. As is '@@RARE@@' (with varying numbers of @ signs). I think there is a filter that automatically adds these if the seller misses them out. |
|||
11-09-2014, 02:24 AM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Hmmmmm
Did you see how much the winning bidder paid? It seems "vintage" status commands a nice premium.
|
|||
11-09-2014, 11:50 PM
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Hmmmmm | |||
11-10-2014, 02:25 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-10-2014 02:27 AM by Steve Simpkin.)
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Hmmmmm
(11-01-2014 08:50 AM)Paul Dale Wrote: "Passes all diagnostic tests" I'm sure it does. You just forgot you put them in, that's all. I mean, it's not like an eBay listing could have anything incorrect in it..... |
|||
11-10-2014, 05:29 PM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Hmmmmm
Well, if it wasn't for the fact that a new WP34S is available for a much lower price elsewhere, the selling price isn't unreasonable for such a powerful calculator. I would certainly consider paying that price for such a well-designed machine. There's nothing else, new or vintage, to touch it!
Nigel (UK) |
|||
11-10-2014, 06:50 PM
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Hmmmmm
(11-01-2014 05:21 PM)rprosperi Wrote:(11-01-2014 09:50 AM)Massimo Gnerucci Wrote: And I didn't think of it as vintage already... the worst of "copy and paste" But the result is that he sold the calculator, ..... good luck to the buyer Agree about all the other comments about listings on TAS, we are all maybe well used to have daily a glance on it |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)