+- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum)
+-- Forum: Not HP Calculators (/forum-7.html)
+--- Forum: Not quite HP Calculators - but related (/forum-8.html)
+--- Thread: DM42 News (/thread-7457.html)
RE: DM42 News - pier4r - 12-05-2017 10:33 PM
(12-05-2017 10:23 PM)Massimo Gnerucci Wrote: site:hpmuseum.org 41c 8770
site:hpmuseum.org 50g 3950
Interesting. I thought google could realize that 41, 41c, 41whatever were often together.
And yes "hp" may be redundant.
RE: DM42 News - Luigi Vampa - 12-05-2017 10:36 PM
(12-05-2017 10:23 PM)Massimo Gnerucci Wrote: site:hpmuseum.org 41c 8770
site:hpmuseum.org 50g 3950
Unsurprisingly, the HP41 is the queen of most RPN devotees in this forum. Nevertheless, I suppose SM targets a wider audience than... say... ca. 100 active forum members? That is why a non-sited Google search seemed more meaningful to me.
Anyway, nobody in this forum has the faintest chance to convince me! Gents, my HP28s is the pinnacle of absolute perfection. Period!!!! ;O)
RE: DM42 News - Massimo Gnerucci - 12-05-2017 10:46 PM
(12-05-2017 10:25 PM)Luigi Vampa Wrote:(12-05-2017 09:50 PM)hth Wrote: Try Google HP-41 = about 85,800,000 hits
Try Google HP-42 = about 7,110,000 hits
HP-41 is way more popular.
Håkan
But Håkan, as a side effect you are including the popular HP 41 ink cartridge for HP color printers, and who knows what other goodies.
I prefer to quote my searches, and include the term you want to refer to: "HP XY calculator". Doing that SAME search for BOTH models seems fair to me.
"hp 42s calculator" 9.400
"hp 41c calculator" 25.800
hp 42s calculator about 157.000
hp 41c calculator about 275.000
So we can pick what we like more... ;)
RE: DM42 News - Massimo Gnerucci - 12-05-2017 10:47 PM
(12-05-2017 10:36 PM)Luigi Vampa Wrote:(12-05-2017 10:23 PM)Massimo Gnerucci Wrote: site:hpmuseum.org 41c 8770
site:hpmuseum.org 50g 3950
Unsurprisingly, the HP41 is the queen of most RPN devotees in this forum. Nevertheless, I suppose SM targets a wider audience than... say... ca. 100 active forum members? That is why a non-sited Google search seemed more meaningful to me.
Anyway, nobody in this forum has the faintest chance to convince me! Gents, my HP28s is the pinnacle of absolute perfection. Period!!!! ;O)
HP28s 7 results, worldwide. :P
RE: DM42 News - Luigi Vampa - 12-05-2017 10:50 PM
(12-05-2017 10:47 PM)Massimo Gnerucci Wrote: HP28s 7 results, worldwide. :Pbut nobody else needs to know il nostro secreto caro Massimo ;^D
RE: DM42 News - hth - 12-05-2017 10:51 PM
(12-05-2017 10:47 PM)Massimo Gnerucci Wrote: HP28s 7 results, worldwide.
Oh, I had one of those, only HP calculator I ever sold...
Håkan
RE: DM42 News - pier4r - 12-05-2017 11:30 PM
(12-05-2017 10:47 PM)Massimo Gnerucci Wrote: HP28s 7 results, worldwide.
Another google interesting result:
site:hpmuseum.org 28 useful link ~ 673 res
site:hpmuseum.org 28 useful links ~ 74 results
Now check the first result of both requests.
RE: DM42 News - Massimo Gnerucci - 12-06-2017 08:37 AM
(12-05-2017 11:30 PM)pier4r Wrote:(12-05-2017 10:47 PM)Massimo Gnerucci Wrote: HP28s 7 results, worldwide.
Another google interesting result:
site:hpmuseum.org 28 useful link ~ 673 res
site:hpmuseum.org 28 useful links ~ 74 results
Now check the first result of both requests.
Why it gives me ~145 results for the first and ~196 for the second?!?!
Google is fooling us!
RE: DM42 News - CY-CL - 12-06-2017 08:43 AM
The production figures from HP-41 calculators are over 1 million. How many HP-42 calculators were produced? I cannot find information’s …
RE: DM42 News - Thomas Okken - 12-06-2017 12:10 PM
(12-06-2017 08:43 AM)CY-CL Wrote: How many HP-42 calculators were produced?
Not enough.
RE: DM42 News - Claudio L. - 12-06-2017 02:47 PM
(12-06-2017 08:37 AM)Massimo Gnerucci Wrote:(12-05-2017 11:30 PM)pier4r Wrote: Another google interesting result:
site:hpmuseum.org 28 useful link ~ 673 res
site:hpmuseum.org 28 useful links ~ 74 results
Now check the first result of both requests.
Why it gives me ~145 results for the first and ~196 for the second?!?!
Google is fooling us!
Because your search results are tailored to your shopping habits, so trying to extract meaningful data from a google search is not very scientific. Each person gets a different result for the same search, depending on what google thinks you would like to find, not what's actually out there.
RE: DM42 News - Michael de Estrada - 12-06-2017 05:28 PM
Google knows more about us than the FBI or NSA.
RE: DM42 News - grsbanks - 12-06-2017 06:58 PM
(12-06-2017 05:28 PM)Michael de Estrada Wrote: Google knows more about us than the FBI or NSA.
The FBI and NSA probably use google to find stuff out about us
RE: DM42 News - John Keith - 12-06-2017 08:49 PM
(12-06-2017 06:58 PM)grsbanks Wrote:(12-06-2017 05:28 PM)Michael de Estrada Wrote: Google knows more about us than the FBI or NSA.
The FBI and NSA probably use google to find stuff out about us
Nowadays they mostly use Facebook.
RE: DM42 News - pier4r - 12-06-2017 10:52 PM
(12-06-2017 02:47 PM)Claudio L. Wrote: Because your search results are tailored to your shopping habits, so trying to extract meaningful data from a google search is not very scientific. Each person gets a different result for the same search, depending on what google thinks you would like to find, not what's actually out there.
I thought that search engines would change the first couple of results for each page, but the total results would be identical.
RE: DM42 News - jebem - 12-06-2017 11:31 PM
Can't resist to tell this well know story, at least on my side of earth (sorry if this is off topic):
A scientific research team, was studying the frogs behavior.
They stared by yelling at the frog: "Jump!"
And the frog jumped.
Then they decided to cut one leg from the frog and told the frog to jump.
The frog did jump.
They scientifically repeat the above procedure four times.
When the frog had no legs, they command the frog to jump.
The frog this time did not jump.
The scientists met for hours and came up with the conclusion:
A frog without legs can not hear.
RE: DM42 News - Michael de Estrada - 12-07-2017 01:50 AM
(12-06-2017 11:10 PM)emersone12 Wrote: Google "Hillary Clinton" = 81,200,000 results
Google "Donald Trump" = 212,000,000 results
And hence, Donald Trump is 2.6 times more popular than Hillary Clinton
That explains why Donald Trump was destined to win as President over Hillary Clinton
Except that in our strange electoral process, you can win an election even though you received less votes than your opponent.
RE: DM42 News - Dave Frederickson - 12-07-2017 08:30 PM
(12-06-2017 11:10 PM)emersone12 Wrote: Google "HP 42s calculator failure" = 32,400 results
Google "HP 41cx calculator failure" = 382,000 results
And hence, the HP41cx is 11 times more failure-prone than the HP42s
also
Google "Hillary Clinton" = 81,200,000 results
Google "Donald Trump" = 212,000,000 results
And hence, Donald Trump is 2.6 times more popular than Hillary Clinton
That depends on how you interpret the data. It could be:
And hence, the HP41cx is 11 times more popular than the HP42s
And hence, Donald Trump is 2.6 times more failure-prone than Hillary Clinton
RE: DM42 News - Scrolllock - 12-07-2017 11:19 PM
Michael said:
"We'll start at Saturday and I'll bring them all to the post office on Monday morning, which should be soon enough to arrive before Christmas."
RE: DM42 News - Mark Hardman - 12-09-2017 07:18 PM
The DM42 is now available on SwissMicro's site:
https://www.swissmicros.com/order.php
Love,
Santa