HP41C - workaround for the SIZE? missing - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum) +-- Forum: HP Calculators (and very old HP Computers) (/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: General Forum (/forum-4.html) +--- Thread: HP41C - workaround for the SIZE? missing (/thread-6074.html) Pages: 1 2 |
RE: HP41C - workaround for the SIZE? missing - Werner - 04-22-2016 06:02 AM (04-21-2016 05:49 PM)Gene Wrote: Couple of items from PPC Journal issues, just for the fun of it. Thanks, Gene! The first two are sequential, so I won't consider them. The third is really interesting, but fails for SIZE 0 and SIZE 257 (possibly more). And the last is shorter only because the label is shorter ;-)) It's an exact match of what I used to have. Perhaps I found it in the PPC Journal myself ;-) Thanks, Werner RE: HP41C - workaround for the SIZE? missing - Werner - 04-22-2016 06:57 AM If speed is what you're after, then this is probably better: (number entry is slow on a 41 compared to other instructions) (38 bytes without END, 29 without LBL and END) Code: >LBL"SIZE?" Cheers, Werner RE: HP41C - workaround for the SIZE? missing - RMollov - 04-22-2016 10:03 PM (04-22-2016 06:57 AM)Werner Wrote: If speed is what you're after, then this is probably better: Something is wrong here. What is IP? If you meant INT, then program ends up with 99.5 registers. So half a register got lost? No good! It isn't quicker than the previous one either. I'm getting 4 seconds within a tolerance of .05 sec timing it by hand. All measured with 100 regs currently allocated. Cheers RE: HP41C - workaround for the SIZE? missing - Werner - 04-23-2016 12:09 PM The wrapup code at the end was wrong, I corrected it. I use Free42 on my phone to test these things, and there INT is IP.. and it's true I didn't do a speed test - the difference would've been small, but should still be noticeable, or so I thought. Werner |