+- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum)
+-- Forum: HP Calculators (and very old HP Computers) (/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: General Forum (/forum-4.html)
+--- Thread: Summation based benchmark for calculators (/thread-9750.html)
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - Hlib - 01-22-2019 12:15 PM
max=1000
TI-83plus (ver.1.16) time=105s
TI-85 (ver.9.0) time=131s
internal result=1395.346287744
Code:
:Prompt N:0
:For(X,1,N,1)
:Ans+cube_root(e^(sin(atan(X))))
:End:AnsRE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - pier4r - 01-26-2019 09:53 PM
I cannot access the wiki4hp (I know it is up, just the routing somehow is messed up) to update the main version that the gets copied in the first post.
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - pier4r - 01-28-2019 12:05 PM
Updated to post #161
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - ijabbott - 02-15-2019 11:11 AM
CASIO FX-502P - Keystroke program (DSZ loop)
MAX 10: ~18.1s
Result: 13.71183501{70}
(Interesting that it doesn't use the guard digits to round up the 10th digit of the display.)
MAX 100: ~182s
Result: 139.2971870{48}
(It's about half the speed of the FX-602P.)
Code:
001 C6-00 Min 0 ; store max N
002 E0 AC ; clear accumulator
003 F0-00 LBL 0 ; start of loop
004 E3 + ; add the following term ...
005 C7-00 MR 0 ; recall N
006 FF-C4 tan^-1
007 C2 sin
008 FF-F9 e^x
009 FF-E2 x^{1/y}
010 03 3 ; this is the end of the term: exp(sin(arctan(N)))^(1/3)
011 FF-01 DSZ ; decrement N (in M0) and skip if zero
012 F1-00 GOTO 0 ; goto start of loop
013 E5 = ; final answerRE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - Jonathan Busby - 02-18-2019 11:13 PM
Here is my summation code, mostly written in Saturn assembly for the HP48G/GX ( ROM version R ) :
Code:
::
0LASTOWDOB!
CK1NOLASTWD
CK&DISPATCH1
real
::
DUP
% 1000000000
%>=
OVER
% 0
%<=
OR
IT
::
#203 ERRORSTO AtUserStack ERRJMP
;
COERCE
CODE
speedup EQU 0
ATANF EQU #2B6FB
SINF EQU #2B6E0
EXPF EQU #2B6AA
GETANGMODE EQU #2AEF6
!NROOTF EQU #2B6CE
PUSH%%LOOP EQU #2A235
ATTNFLG EQU #807F7
GOSBVL =POP#
GOSBVL =SAVPTR
C=A A
C=C-1 A
GONC no_error
P= 0
GOSBVL =GETPTR
LA(5) #203
GOVLNG =Errjmp
no_error
RSTK=C
IF speedup
GOSUB SPD1
ENDIF
GOSBVL GETANGMODE
GOSUB +
BSS 16
BSS 16
+ C=RSTK
D1=C
C=0 W
DAT1=C W
D1=D1+ 16
DAT1=C W
D1=D1- 16
R4=C.F W
-
D0=(5) ATTNFLG
A=DAT0 A
?A#0 A
GOYES onkeyexit1
onkeyexit1
GONC +
GOTO onkeyexit2
+ A=R4.F W
P= 15
LC(1) 14
C=C-A P
P=C 15
C=0 W
C=C+1 P
SETDEC
P= 14
A=A+C WP
SETHEX
GONC noadjust
A=A+1 S
P= 14
ASR WP
LC(1) 1
A=A+C P
noadjust
C=0 W
C=A S
P=C 15
C=0 W
C=P 0
R4=A.F W
B=A W
B=0 S
A=C W
P= 0
SETDEC
GOSBVL ATANF
GOSBVL SINF
GOSBVL EXPF
SETHEX
C=0 W
D=C W
P= 14
LC(1) 3
D=C P
P= 0
C=0 W
SETDEC
GOSBVL !NROOTF
SETHEX
C=DAT1 W
D=C W
D1=D1+ 16
C=DAT1 W
D1=D1- 16
CDEX W
SETDEC
GOSBVL =RADDF
SETHEX
DAT1=A W
C=B W
D1=D1+ 16
DAT1=C W
D1=D1- 16
C=RSTK
C=C-1 A
GOC +
RSTK=C
GOTO -
+
IF speedup
GOSUB SPD2
ENDIF
P= 0
GOVLNG PUSH%%LOOP
onkeyexit2
IF speedup
GOSUB SPD2
ENDIF
P= 0
GOVLNG =GETPTRLOOP
SPD1
GOSBVL =DispOff
INTOFF
RTN
SPD2
GOSBVL =DispOn
INTON
RTN
ENDCODE
;
;The results are as follows :
*Display and keyboard scanning turned on*
- 10 : 0.41739 seconds, result = 13.7118350167043
- 100 : 4.31073 seconds, result = 139.297187045924
- 1000 : 39.74079 seconds, result = 1395.34628774339
- 10000 : 376.86231 seconds, result = 13955.8579042908
and
*Display and keyboard scanning turned off*
( Same long real numeric results as above )
- 10 : 0.36663 seconds
- 100 : 3.77957 seconds
- 1000 : 34.81678 seconds
- 10000 : 330.17057 seconds
I hope this helps.
Jonathan
EDIT : I have attached the HP48G/GX-R binary and the source as well.
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - pier4r - 02-19-2019 07:30 PM
updated until post #165
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - ijabbott - 02-19-2019 08:20 PM
(12-22-2017 09:41 PM)pier4r Wrote: max = 100
~ 14s - casio fx991 version , 1395.346288 (the slow batch reported by other users) sum function
The reported result is incorrect for that one, it should be 139.2971870.
(N.B. These fx991 listings are for the fx-991EX (classwiz), not for the older fx-991ms, fx-991es, and fx-991es plus.)
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - pier4r - 02-20-2019 05:28 PM
Nice catch. I always hope find some small problems. I'll fix it soon.
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - ijabbott - 02-21-2019 08:07 AM
(02-19-2019 08:20 PM)ijabbott Wrote:(12-22-2017 09:41 PM)pier4r Wrote: max = 100
~ 14s - casio fx991 version , 1395.346288 (the slow batch reported by other users) sum function
The reported result is incorrect for that one, it should be 139.2971870.
(N.B. These fx991 listings are for the fx-991EX (classwiz), not for the older fx-991ms, fx-991es, and fx-991es plus.)
Also, for completeness, the "fast batch" fx-991EX timing for max=100 is ~11s.
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - grsbanks - 02-21-2019 02:38 PM
1000 iterations on a SwissMicros DM10L @ 48MHz:
120s -- result = 1,395.346288
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - rprosperi - 02-21-2019 02:46 PM
(02-21-2019 02:38 PM)grsbanks Wrote: 1000 iterations on a SwissMicros DM10L @ 48MHz:
120s -- result = 1,395.346288
Show off...
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - grsbanks - 02-21-2019 02:57 PM
(02-21-2019 02:46 PM)rprosperi Wrote: Show off...
Other considerations aside, I'm pleasantly surprised by the speed. It's just marginally faster than a DM11L, itself about 20x the speed of the HP-11C.
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - Marc van Lemmen - 05-26-2019 07:13 PM
Hi,
I am not sure if BIG old calculators are allowed, but I recently bought a HP9821A and I was curious how the HP9821A would perform against the modern calculators. Here are the results :
10 : ~4s result 13.71183502
100 : ~38s result 139.2971870
1000: ~390s result 1395.346288
I'll try my HP9100B later.
Regards,
Marc.
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - pier4r - 05-26-2019 08:36 PM
Everything is allowed that is handheld or it is specifically a calculator rather than a app on a general purpose system.
Or it is an app on a very restricted system mobile without quintillions of apps (like smartphones that were designed to not be tweaked by the users, like nokias, palm, and so on). Although the second category is valid only as loose reference.
So yes the 98x0 and 9100 series are welcomed! I am still impressed by the articles in the hp journal where in practice they say "you can do anything with them" and indeed I guess some did.
edit. wiki 4hp is unreachable for me (but it is up for other sites) so I will try another time. I need to catch up with the last posts.
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - pier4r - 05-28-2019 11:06 PM
updated to post #173 now that I can see http://www.wiki4hp.com (damn routing in my zone!)
Impressive how the 9821A compares with modern day solar powered scientific calculators or the wp 34s . Neat!
How much ram/user storage has it again? I remember the 9100 was around 400 steps (estended to 3000+ with an extension)
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - Marc van Lemmen - 05-29-2019 03:00 PM
My HP9821A has a total of 423 registers ( Option 001 installed, a HP9820 with option 001 has 435 registers according to the manual !). One register is 4 words ( manual ), so that is 3384 bytes. There is also some internal memory, at least 256 words, so the total should be around 4Kb.
I think a HP9820/9821 without option 001 installed has about 2Kb of ram.
By the way, the HP9821A is not RPN but algebraic. Programming method is pre HPL.
My HP9100B is not working fine, he works intermittend. And there is no power or cube-root function, I am working on it but it will take some time. I have a workaround, but less steps, so that would be difficult to compare.
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - Marc van Lemmen - 05-31-2019 11:19 PM
I've got it running on my HP9100B, but with another formula since there is no power function. Math is not my strong point, but i've used exp(ln(exp(sin(atan)))/3) which is al fraction faster than the original formula.
On my HP9821A it gave the following results : 10 ~4 sec. / 100 ~37 sec. / 1000 ~375 sec.
Result for the HP9100B :
10 ~6.5 sec. result 13.71183502
100 ~66 sec. result 139.2971870
Since my Hp9100B stops working after a few minutes I was not able to run it with 1000.
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - lrdheat - 07-09-2019 02:02 AM
I tried the simplest summation, sum of x from x=1 through x=500,000 on my TI 36X Pro, the European edition of the 36X Pro (TI-30X Pro MathPrint), my version A Prime from 5 or 6 years ago?, and the Prime G2 that I got Sunday at BB in Laredo!
36X: ~1 hour 45 minutes
30X: 18 minutes 45 seconds
Prime A: ~8 seconds
Prime G2: ~3.5 seconds (of course, in CAS, the answer appears instantly)
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - ijabbott - 07-09-2019 07:39 AM
(07-09-2019 02:02 AM)lrdheat Wrote: the European edition of the 36X Pro (TI-30X Pro MathPrint)
Just to be clear, there are two TI-30X Pro models: the older "MultiView" model (which is the same as the TI-36X Pro), and the newer "MathPrint" model (no American version yet).
RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - Gamo - 07-09-2019 12:44 PM
Casio fx-991EX
n=1000
t~ 2 min 15 sec
Result=1395.3463
Gamo