(Free42) roundoff for complex SQRT - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum) +-- Forum: Not HP Calculators (/forum-7.html) +--- Forum: Not quite HP Calculators - but related (/forum-8.html) +--- Thread: (Free42) roundoff for complex SQRT (/thread-10440.html) Pages: 1 2 |
RE: (Free42) roundoff for complex SQRT - Werner - 02-12-2021 02:45 PM Resurrecting this old thread ... When X = 0+iB, SQRT(X) should have equal real and imaginary parts (apart from the sign). But that is (still) not the case. The 48G algorithm I posted gives the correct result - in the 48, with its 3 extra digits, but not in Free42. Example: -1E-12 SQRT SQRT COMPLEX - equals -1E-37, exactly what you get when you follow the 48G algorithm. Cheers, Werner RE: (Free42) roundoff for complex SQRT - Thomas Okken - 02-12-2021 07:44 PM (02-12-2021 02:45 PM)Werner Wrote: When X = 0+iB, SQRT(X) should have equal real and imaginary parts (apart from the sign). I don't think that is something I ever tested. I implemented your algorithm in 2.0.21 and verified that it gave the desired result for 0+iB when B/2 is a perfect square... I suppose this means an explicit check for Re(X)=0 will be needed after all. RE: (Free42) roundoff for complex SQRT - Werner - 02-12-2021 08:12 PM according to the thread, you implemented a specific Re()=0 test? RE: (Free42) roundoff for complex SQRT - Thomas Okken - 02-12-2021 09:35 PM That's what I was thinking of doing at first, but then you suggested the 48G algorithm, and I implemented that instead. There is no check for pure imaginary. free42/common/core_commands6.cc Code: static int mappable_sqrt_c(phloat xre, phloat xim, phloat *yre, phloat *yim) { |