HP Forums
Casio FX-1000f vs Casio FX-5000f - Printable Version

+- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum)
+-- Forum: Not HP Calculators (/forum-7.html)
+--- Forum: Not remotely HP Calculators (/forum-9.html)
+--- Thread: Casio FX-1000f vs Casio FX-5000f (/thread-14457.html)



Casio FX-1000f vs Casio FX-5000f - Moggul - 02-01-2020 10:33 PM

Although I switched to RPN HPs as soon as I could, I remember using a Casio FX-1000f during my school days. I loved the formula library and overall it performed quite well.

So I am searching for one and I see two similar models, the FX-1000f and the FX-5000f. Does anyone know the differences between them?


RE: Casio FX-1000f vs Casio FX-5000f - Mjim - 02-01-2020 11:33 PM

According to ledudu, it's just the addition of hyperbolic functions (and their inverse):
https://casio.ledudu.com/pockets.asp?type=154&lg=eng

I'm kind of curious as to why the addition of hyperbolic function was such a big feature at the time that they changed the shape of the calculator (The 5000F is a flatter calculator) and gave it a new model name.


RE: Casio FX-1000f vs Casio FX-5000f - ijabbott - 02-02-2020 10:47 AM

(02-01-2020 11:33 PM)Mjim Wrote:  According to ledudu, it's just the addition of hyperbolic functions (and their inverse):
https://casio.ledudu.com/pockets.asp?type=154&lg=eng

I'm kind of curious as to why the addition of hyperbolic function was such a big feature at the time that they changed the shape of the calculator (The 5000F is a flatter calculator) and gave it a new model name.

The fx-5000F included a folding wallet, so needed to be flat.


RE: Casio FX-1000f vs Casio FX-5000f - Moggul - 02-02-2020 12:23 PM

(02-02-2020 10:47 AM)ijabbott Wrote:  The fx-5000F included a folding wallet, so needed to be flat.

This settles it then! My calculator had a folding wallet so it must have benn a 5000f. My memory is a bit hazy after 30+ years...


RE: Casio FX-1000f vs Casio FX-5000f - cdmackay - 02-02-2020 10:49 PM

This reminds me of a conversation we had last year on the 6000G/6500G; they share a manual, and I posted that the only difference I could find was the latter added hyperbolics, other than the thickness.

I only have the 5000F, but it also shares a manual, with the 1000F and, again, the only differences I can see are added hyperbolics and the thickness/angle. A pattern emerges… Smile