Infinite series - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum) +-- Forum: HP Calculators (and very old HP Computers) (/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: HP Prime (/forum-5.html) +--- Thread: Infinite series (/thread-15167.html) |
Infinite series - lrdheat - 06-10-2020 02:16 AM Summation of (1/x^3) from x=1 to infinity produces Zeta(3) which is correct, ~1.20206. Why does summation of (1/x^2) from x=1 to infinity produce +/- infinity on my G2? For that matter the summation for 1/x^odd integer produces correct results, incorrect for (1/x^even integer). A summation of (1/x^p) should converge for any p>1. RE: Infinite series - lrdheat - 06-10-2020 03:53 AM In home, the summations (1/x^even integer from 1 to infinity) are approximated correctly...why is there a difficulty in CAS? RE: Infinite series - ijabbott - 06-10-2020 08:14 AM It works on my G1. RE: Infinite series - ramon_ea1gth - 06-10-2020 12:20 PM My G2 also gives, in the CAS, a finite result for 1/x^2, i.e., (pi^2)/6. Anyway, my firmware is not the most recent: 2.0.0.13865 (2018 08 02), so I have to update it. RE: Infinite series - cdmackay - 06-10-2020 04:00 PM (06-10-2020 12:20 PM)ramon_ea1gth Wrote: My G2 also gives, in the CAS, a finite result for 1/x^2, i.e., (pi^2)/6. Anyway, my firmware is not the most recent: 2.0.0.13865 (2018 08 02), so I have to update it. Same result for me in the emulator [2.1.14425 (2020 1 16)], and also my G2 [2.1.14433 (2020 01 21)] RE: Infinite series - pinkman - 06-10-2020 09:36 PM (06-10-2020 02:16 AM)lrdheat Wrote: Summation of (1/x^3) from x=1 to infinity produces Zeta(3) which is correct, ~1.20206. Why does summation of (1/x^2) from x=1 to infinity produce +/- infinity on my G2? For that matter the summation for 1/x^odd integer produces correct results, incorrect for (1/x^even integer). A summation of (1/x^p) should converge for any p>1. Seeing the above answers you should give us the command line you used. Mine are: Home: Code:
CAS: Code:
RE: Infinite series - lrdheat - 06-11-2020 02:42 AM When I use the template in CAS, it comes up with +/- infinity if a small “x” is used (as is default in CAS). If I use capital “X” in CAS, I just discovered that the correct pi^2/6 comes up for summation 1/X^2 from 1 to infinity. Why is this, and do I have some setting incorrectly set to produce this odd behavior? RE: Infinite series - pinkman - 06-11-2020 09:17 AM try to delete all values and assumptions of x: Code:
RE: Infinite series - lrdheat - 06-11-2020 02:36 PM Thanks...that worked. I did not suspect this was the problem since the series worked for odd powers! RE: Infinite series - cdmackay - 06-11-2020 04:25 PM In general, if you want to see/check user variables: created in Home, := or Sto▸ - viewed with memory manager Shift B — User Variables - select, then delete or backspace created in CAS, = or Sto▸ - viewed with memory manager Shift B — CAS Vars - select, then delete or backspace - may also be deleted with CAS function purge(), which only works on CAS vars - purge() also removes assumptions about vars, as well as value A couple of CAS programs have been posted on this forum in the past: varslist() - shows all defined lowercase single letter vars, both Home & CAS purgeaz() - purges all single small-letter CAS variables, excluding e & i which are reserved - does not affect Home variables, which can only be deleted using memory manager (shift B) RE: Infinite series - pinkman - 06-11-2020 05:01 PM (06-11-2020 02:36 PM)lrdheat Wrote: Thanks...that worked. I did not suspect this was the problem since the series worked for odd powers! Maybe x was assumed to be negative. |