+- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum)
+-- Forum: HP Software Libraries (/forum-10.html)
+--- Forum: HP-41C Software Library (/forum-11.html)
+--- Thread: (41) JETLOG Program (/thread-16055.html)
Pages: 1 2
(41) JETLOG Program - WrongWay - 12-15-2020 06:06 AM
This was a program my father wrote, it appears to be a flight planning application. I could use some help deciphering it. It does run. Run size and set to 100 to fully load the program
2022/02/19
corrected the original program and attached it to this post
RE: JETLOG Program - bbergman - 12-15-2020 05:23 PM
Sounds like a project for Geoff Quickfall
RE: JETLOG Program - WrongWay - 12-15-2020 06:44 PM
I wasn't sure if it belonged in the software library as it lacks documentation. Any help in deciphering what is going on is greatly appreciated
RE: JETLOG Program - CY-CL - 12-15-2020 06:48 PM
Set Size to 100
RE: (41) JETLOG Program - Ángel Martin - 05-13-2021 07:13 AM
(12-15-2020 06:06 AM)WrongWay Wrote: This was a program my father wrote, it appears to be a flight planning application. I could use some help deciphering it. It does run. Run size and set to 100 to fully load the program
In line 16 there's a GT0 CF but LBL "CF" is nowhere to be found. Is this a typo??
GTO C doesn't look likely either given where the instruction is: no previous test and no LBL after it.
Would be good if you can double check the listing...
Code:
X=0?
GTO 00
SF 03
GTO CF
FS? 00
GTO 01
LBL 00RE: (41) JETLOG Program - C.Ret - 05-19-2021 03:33 PM
There is also a REGMOVE command, this code may need the XFunctions module ?
RE: (41) JETLOG Program - Stevetuc - 05-20-2021 09:59 AM
(05-13-2021 07:13 AM)Ángel Martin Wrote:(12-15-2020 06:06 AM)WrongWay Wrote: This was a program my father wrote, it appears to be a flight planning application. I could use some help deciphering it. It does run. Run size and set to 100 to fully load the program
In line 16 there's a GT0 CF but LBL "CF" is nowhere to be found. Is this a typo??
GTO C doesn't look likely either given where the instruction is: no previous test and no LBL after it.
Would be good if you can double check the listing...
Code:
X=0?
GTO 00
SF 03
GTO CF
FS? 00
GTO 01
LBL 00
It looks like the CF flag is being used for indirection
Ie if CF= 03 GTO CF > GTO LBL 03
RE: (41) JETLOG Program - Ángel Martin - 05-21-2021 05:21 AM
(05-20-2021 09:59 AM)Stevetuc Wrote: It looks like the CF flag is being used for indirection
Ie if CF= 03 GTO CF > GTO LBL 03
I don't think so; if this was the case when are the instructions that follow executed?
RE: (41) JETLOG Program - twdeckard - 05-22-2021 01:11 AM
(05-21-2021 05:21 AM)Ángel Martin Wrote:(05-20-2021 09:59 AM)Stevetuc Wrote: It looks like the CF flag is being used for indirection
Ie if CF= 03 GTO CF > GTO LBL 03
I don't think so; if this was the case when are the instructions that follow executed?
Is it a clever synthetic though? couldn’t you use the first (top) 10 keys as surrogates for 00-10 in STO and RCL and GTO?
I think a piece of the program is missing though, there aren’t routines sensitive to flag 03?
Todd
RE: (41) JETLOG Program - Massimo Gnerucci - 05-22-2021 05:07 AM
(05-22-2021 01:11 AM)twdeckard Wrote: couldn’t you use the first (top) 10 keys as surrogates for 00-10 in STO and RCL and GTO?
Yes, but 01-10.
RE: (41) JETLOG Program - WrongWay - 02-19-2022 10:40 PM
There might have been a typo at my hand. I will rescan the tapes and see if I can transcribe them better. I've seen mention of some USB hardware that might be of use but no idea what i need to do to make that a reality
RE: (41) JETLOG Program - WrongWay - 02-20-2022 12:15 AM
(05-13-2021 07:13 AM)Ángel Martin Wrote:(12-15-2020 06:06 AM)WrongWay Wrote: This was a program my father wrote, it appears to be a flight planning application. I could use some help deciphering it. It does run. Run size and set to 100 to fully load the program
In line 16 there's a GT0 CF but LBL "CF" is nowhere to be found. Is this a typo??
GTO C doesn't look likely either given where the instruction is: no previous test and no LBL after it.
Would be good if you can double check the listing...
Code:
X=0?
GTO 00
SF 03
GTO CF
FS? 00
GTO 01
LBL 00
Yes, this should be GTO "C"
RE: (41) JETLOG Program - WrongWay - 02-20-2022 05:06 AM
I tried compiling this program and I can't seem to get it to run on V41, it gets to STO 50 and returns NONEXISTANT. How is it possible?
Answer: It requires Synthetic Programming
RE: (41) JETLOG Program - twdeckard - 02-20-2022 10:25 AM
Wrong way, did you pull the program down? could you repost it?
Best
Todd
RE: (41) JETLOG Program - twdeckard - 02-20-2022 11:16 AM
Wrong way, did you pull the program down? could you repost it?
Best
Todd
RE: (41) JETLOG Program - C.Ret - 02-20-2022 11:44 AM
(02-20-2022 05:06 AM)WrongWay Wrote: I tried compiling this program and I can't seem to get it to run on V41, it gets to STO 50 and returns NONEXISTANT. How is it possible?
Are you sure you were using the correct SIZE parameter ?
RE: (41) JETLOG Program - WrongWay - 02-20-2022 06:30 PM
Great question! I am not sure I am using the correct size parameter. This code was found in a box of magnetic strips and there is no documentation about it anywhere.
RE: (41) JETLOG Program - WrongWay - 02-20-2022 06:40 PM
JETLOG program attached. for some reason I can't attache raw files, but the zip file contains the raw
RE: (41) JETLOG Program - WrongWay - 02-22-2022 04:16 PM
The size appears to be 176.
RE: (41) JETLOG Program - Ángel Martin - 02-25-2022 10:14 AM
(02-20-2022 12:15 AM)WrongWay Wrote:(05-13-2021 07:13 AM)Ángel Martin Wrote: In line 16 there's a GT0 CF but LBL "CF" is nowhere to be found. Is this a typo??
GTO C doesn't look likely either given where the instruction is: no previous test and no LBL after it.
Would be good if you can double check the listing...
Code:
X=0?
GTO 00
SF 03
GTO CF
FS? 00
GTO 01
LBL 00
Yes, this should be GTO "C"
I wouldn't think so, that would mean that the following two program steps are never executed:
SF 03
GTO "C"
FS? 00
GTO 01
LBL 00
...
It's probably more likely to be this, changing SF 03 with FS? 03:
FS? 03
GTO C
FS? 00
GTO 01
LBL 00
...
right?