On the format of the output of fMax - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum) +-- Forum: HP Calculators (and very old HP Computers) (/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: HP Prime (/forum-5.html) +--- Thread: On the format of the output of fMax (/thread-1728.html) |
On the format of the output of fMax - Alberto Candel - 06-27-2014 12:32 AM In CAS, the input fMax(f(x),x=a..b) returns a sequence consisting of the numbers x between a and b where the function f attains a Max value. For example, fMax(x^2, x=-2..2) returns -2,2. However, if there is just one such value x, it returns seq[x], like fMax(x+1,x=-2..2) returning seq[2]. Why not just 2, or even better, {2} (or {-2,2} above)? Some of my Adv Calc students have a Prime (because I suggested it to them) and at first could not understand the "seq[x]" thing. (As Helge points out below, there was a typo. I have replaced fMax(x+1,x=-2,2) with fMax(x+1,x=-2..2).) RE: On the format of the output of fMax - Helge Gabert - 06-27-2014 01:50 PM Not sure what you are meaning to say, and there must be a typo somewhere in the OP, because fMax(x+1,x=-2,2) is non-sensical and returns an error message for me "Bad argument value." fMax(x+1,x=-2..2) returns 2 (correct). I don't get the seq[.] output at all. RE: On the format of the output of fMax - parisse - 06-27-2014 04:27 PM The output of fMax is a sequence, that is a list of values without delimiters. Since you could not make the distinction between a sequence of one element and the element, the sequence is printed with seq[ ... ] if there is one element inside. RE: On the format of the output of fMax - Alberto Candel - 06-27-2014 04:30 PM (06-27-2014 01:50 PM)Helge Gabert Wrote: Not sure what you are meaning to say, and there must be a typo somewhere in the OP, because fMax(x+1,x=-2,2) is non-sensical and returns an error message for me "Bad argument value." Yes, there was a typo. Fixed it. Thanks! But I do get seq[2]. Maybe we have different settings somewhere in the Prime system? RE: On the format of the output of fMax - Helge Gabert - 06-27-2014 05:26 PM Yes, we must have different CAS settings. I have angle measure: rad, number format: std, integers: dec, simplify: min, exact, use sqrt, principal, use i checked. The second settings page probably doesn't matter. [By the way, it would be neat, if at some point in the future fMin and fMax could be expanded to also find minima and maxima in two (or more) dimensions . . . just dreaming]. RE: On the format of the output of fMax - Alberto Candel - 06-27-2014 07:53 PM (06-27-2014 05:26 PM)Helge Gabert Wrote: Yes, we must have different CAS settings. well, i have the same settings as you, but still get seq[.]. RE: On the format of the output of fMax - Helge Gabert - 06-27-2014 08:51 PM [attachment=903] OK, here is the emulator screen (physical prime is the same). RE: On the format of the output of fMax - DrD - 06-27-2014 09:09 PM After purge(x): fMax(x+1,x=-2..2) results in seq[2] At first the "error: Bad Argument" result was received because x had a previous value. I used purge to remove the x variable before this would work. -Dale- RE: On the format of the output of fMax - Alberto Candel - 06-28-2014 04:53 AM (06-27-2014 05:26 PM)Helge Gabert Wrote: Yes, we must have different CAS settings. well, i have the same settings as you, but still get seq[.]. RE: On the format of the output of fMax - parisse - 06-28-2014 06:11 AM seq[...] is displayed if textbook display is not checked. RE: On the format of the output of fMax - Alberto Candel - 06-28-2014 02:36 PM (06-28-2014 06:11 AM)parisse Wrote: seq[...] is displayed if textbook display is not checked. Yes! thank you! i forget that there is textbook display and textbook entry. |