![]() |
Casio Scientific Calculator and Ran# - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum) +-- Forum: Not HP Calculators (/forum-7.html) +--- Forum: Not remotely HP Calculators (/forum-9.html) +--- Thread: Casio Scientific Calculator and Ran# (/thread-20061.html) |
Casio Scientific Calculator and Ran# - Gamo - 06-07-2023 07:07 AM Just noticed that most of the Casio Scientific Calculator only give 3 decimal digits output from the Ran# function. When I try to do the 6 digits Random number with this input Ran# x 899999 + 10^5 Here is some of the random result with FIX 0 for 6 digits random number. 614799, 438400, 505900, 752499 and 435700 Notice that the last two digit will always have 99 and 00 ---------------------------------------------------------------- To make this a rather better Random result I did this way. Ran#^Ran# x 899999 +10^5 Here is the random result 611299, 621167, 304497, 997392, 395310 and 438358 Gamo RE: Casio Scientific Calculator and Ran# - HKG - 06-07-2023 08:57 AM if ran# x ran#, the result is ranged from 0.000 to 0.998001 which does not cover fully from 0 to 0.99999 How about using this : ran# x 1000 + ran# x 10^6 ? This will cover fully from 0 to 999999 RE: Casio Scientific Calculator and Ran# - Gamo - 06-07-2023 10:41 AM Thanks HKG That one is really good input as Ran# x 10^3 + Ran# x 10^6 Here is some of the result 464598, 764627, 949309, 651623 and 502449 Gamo RE: Casio Scientific Calculator and Ran# - Dave Britten - 06-07-2023 12:08 PM Usually on these older models, I just do Ran#+Ran#/1E3. Six digits are enough for whatever I'm doing with that old calculator. ![]() RE: Casio Scientific Calculator and Ran# - pier4r - 06-09-2023 03:42 PM On a side note, unless I am mistaken random^random or random*random produce a different distribution than a uniform one. The random*10^3 + random*^10^6 should be still a uniform distribution. |