Why is x*sqrt(x) not x^(3/2)? - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum) +-- Forum: HP Calculators (and very old HP Computers) (/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: HP Prime (/forum-5.html) +--- Thread: Why is x*sqrt(x) not x^(3/2)? (/thread-20302.html) |
Why is x*sqrt(x) not x^(3/2)? - Switchs - 08-11-2023 05:50 PM Please find the expeceted/obtained result in the image attached. I am moving to the HP prime after owning an Nspire for many years, so im still adjusting. I tried searching the forum but could not find an answer. I also tried turning various simplification tabs on/off but nothing seems to work. What am I missing? RE: Why is x*sqrt(x) not x^(3/2)? - parisse - 08-12-2023 04:29 PM Both are valid. On the HP, x^(3/2) is rewritten as x*sqrt(x). RE: Why is x*sqrt(x) not x^(3/2)? - Quadratica - 08-25-2023 03:40 PM Same here, long time Ti Nspire CAS user still getting used to Prime and can't say I like what I see in respect of algebra. I am going to persevere a little longer but if it can't do what I need then I'll sell it. I esp hate that * bloody symbol between every letter and number, it just makes it so hard to read an algebraic output. 2*x*y+3*y-3*x instead of 2x.y+3y-3x RE: Why is x*sqrt(x) not x^(3/2)? - toml_12953 - 08-25-2023 06:44 PM (08-25-2023 03:40 PM)Quadratica Wrote: I am going to persevere a little longer but if it can't do what I need then I'll sell it. I esp hate that * bloody symbol between every letter and number, it just makes it so hard to read an algebraic output. Since it uses PEMDAS rather than PEJMDAS, if they allowed you to forgo the * symbol, you'd REALLY be confused when you got the "wrong" answers! |