+- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum)
+-- Forum: HP Calculators (and very old HP Computers) (/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: General Forum (/forum-4.html)
+--- Thread: ACURACY (/thread-6445.html)
ACURACY - RPL Calcs - 06-22-2016 05:33 PM
The result from the evaluation of this equation
ARCSIN(ARCCOS(ARCTAN(TAN(COS(SIN(9)))))) is 8.99999864267
in the Saturn models:
HP-19BII
HP-20S
HP-22S
HP-27S
HP-28C/S
HP-32S/SII
HP-38G
HP-39G
HP-42S
HP-48SX/S/G/GX/G+/GII
HP-49G/G+
HP-50G
HP-71B
Look other results:
http://www.rskey.org/~mwsebastian/miscprj/models.htm
Best regards,
RE: ACURACY - dalupus - 06-22-2016 05:51 PM
HP35S 8.99999986001
HPPrime 8.99999864267 In rpn mode
HPPrime 9 in CAS mode
Did we actually find a case where the 35s is actually more accurate at a trig function?
RE: ACURACY - RPL Calcs - 06-22-2016 06:18 PM
:0 My HP 15C LE, in DEG mode, evaluates to
9.000417403
the same value of the table.
The HP 42S emulator evaluates to 9.
Quote:HPPrime 8.99999864267 In rpn modeQuestion: HP Prime also emulates Saturn? :-)
RE: ACURACY - Jake Schwartz - 06-22-2016 07:08 PM
(06-22-2016 06:18 PM)RPL Calcs Wrote: :0 My HP 15C LE, in DEG mode, evaluates to
9.000417403
the same value of the table.
The HP 42S emulator evaluates to 9.
Quote:HPPrime 8.99999864267 In rpn modeQuestion: HP Prime also emulates Saturn? :-)
FWIW, in double-precision mode, on the WP-34S I get:
8.999 999 999 999 999 999 999 999 999 937 535
Jake
RE: ACURACY - Dieter - 06-22-2016 10:35 PM
(06-22-2016 06:18 PM)RPL Calcs Wrote: My HP 15C LE, in DEG mode, evaluates to
9.000417403
That's the perfect result for a 10-digit calculator. If it would return anything closer to 9 or even a plain 9 it would run faulty software.
BTW the other mentioned value 8,99999864267 is the perfect result for a correctly operating 12-digit calculator.
(06-22-2016 06:18 PM)RPL Calcs Wrote: The HP 42S emulator evaluates to 9.
I don't think that e.g. Free42 returns 9. Maybe that's what you see, but this is not the calculated result. Subtract 9 from this and see what you get. ;-)
Dieter
RE: ACURACY - Gerson W. Barbosa - 06-22-2016 11:18 PM
(06-22-2016 10:35 PM)Dieter Wrote:(06-22-2016 06:18 PM)RPL Calcs Wrote: My HP 15C LE, in DEG mode, evaluates to
9.000417403
That's the perfect result for a 10-digit calculator. If it would return anything closer to 9 or even a plain 9 it would run faulty software.
That's exactly what I get on my HP-12C Prestige running this 399-step program :-)
Gerson.
RE: ACURACY - RPL Calcs - 06-22-2016 11:44 PM
Quote:I don't think that e.g. Free42 returns 9. Maybe that's what you see, but this is not the calculated result. Subtract 9 from this and see what you get. ;-)
The emulator is Free42. You´re RIGHT. 9 9 - returns -6.2466E-29
RE: ACURACY - Dieter - 06-23-2016 07:49 AM
(06-22-2016 11:44 PM)RPL Calcs Wrote: The emulator is Free42. You´re RIGHT. 9 9 - returns -6.2466E-29
Sure. A little bit of calculus shows that about six digits are lost. So this is the expected result.
BTW the WP34s returns virtually the same result, here the difference is 6,2465 E–29. You obviously use Free42 Decimal which AFAIK is based on the same 34-digit floating point library.
Dieter
RE: ACURACY - Dieter - 06-23-2016 08:05 AM
(06-22-2016 05:51 PM)dalupus Wrote: HP35S 8.99999986001
HPPrime 8.99999864267 In rpn mode
HPPrime 9 in CAS mode
Did we actually find a case where the 35s is actually more accurate at a trig function?
No, we didn't. The correct result for a 12-digit calculator is 8,99999864267.
The 35s rounds down the arctan although it should round up: the exact value is 0,999996272743 534... which is rounded to ...43 on the 35s and to ...44 on other calculators. Once this is adjusted the 35s yields the same correct result as the Saturn calculators. On the other hand this is a close case, and the trig functions may have an error of 0,6 ULP, so this still is within the allowed tolerance.
Dieter
RE: ACURACY - ijabbott - 06-25-2016 06:44 PM
(06-22-2016 05:51 PM)dalupus Wrote: HP35S 8.99999986001FWIW:
HPPrime 8.99999864267 In rpn mode
HPPrime 9 in CAS mode
Did we actually find a case where the 35s is actually more accurate at a trig function?
TI Nspire CX CAS 8.99999998177 in approximate mode
TI Nspire CX CAS 9 in exact mode
RE: ACURACY - Paul Dale - 06-25-2016 11:09 PM
(06-23-2016 07:49 AM)Dieter Wrote: BTW the WP34s returns virtually the same result, here the difference is 6,2465 E–29. You obviously use Free42 Decimal which AFAIK is based on the same 34-digit floating point library.
The floating point library only provides basic arithmetic, square root and natural logarithm and exponential. The trigonometric functions are implemented differently on each.
I believe that Free42 Decimal has moved to the Intel decimal library which is different again. It is much faster than the 34S's code but it is also much larger -- there are quite a few large lookup tables and it uses binary arithmetic and transcendental functions to get initial approximations for decimal results. In effect, you end up with two mathematics libraries.
Pauli