Pandigital e - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum) +-- Forum: Not HP Calculators (/forum-7.html) +--- Forum: Not remotely HP Calculators (/forum-9.html) +--- Thread: Pandigital e (/thread-7476.html) |
Pandigital e - Paul Dale - 12-28-2016 11:40 AM This video presents a lovely pandigital approximation for Euler's e: Pauli RE: Pandigital e - Gerson W. Barbosa - 01-01-2017 12:14 AM Speaking of pandigital approximations, Happy '5*EXP(6)-INV(LN(1039-EXP(-LN(2^(7-√4+8)))))' ! Not so lovely, but this should evaluate (almost) nicely on the wp34s (DBLOFF). Gerson. RE: Pandigital e - Paul Dale - 01-01-2017 12:42 AM I've got a nice one that doesn't use any digits: π →HR TANH TAN⁻¹ x² Degrees mode only. Use FIX 0 or add an IP to the end. Pauli RE: Pandigital e - Gerson W. Barbosa - 01-01-2017 03:32 AM Not so accurate, but digits 1 through 9 in order (well, sort of): 'EXP(EXP(EXP(EXP(-.345678912))))-INV(π)+INV(π^π+INV(π)+e)+(π^π)^-π' RE: Pandigital e - Paul Dale - 01-01-2017 08:32 AM Okay, I'll use two sequential digits: \( \lfloor 5 e^6 \rfloor \) RE: Pandigital e - Paul Dale - 01-01-2017 08:43 AM Or just unity but two levels of exponents: \( \lfloor e^{10^{SINH^{-1}1}} \rfloor \) RE: Pandigital e - Gerson W. Barbosa - 01-01-2017 10:44 AM (01-01-2017 08:43 AM)Paul Dale Wrote: Or just unity but two levels of exponents: Nice one-digit one! I still can't make it without all ten of them, though: \(\lfloor 6.538472901! \rfloor \) RE: Pandigital e - Paul Dale - 01-01-2017 11:03 AM (01-01-2017 10:44 AM)Gerson W. Barbosa Wrote: \(\lfloor 6.538472901! \rfloor \) You don't need the 01 at the end Pauli RE: Pandigital e - Gerson W. Barbosa - 01-01-2017 11:04 AM Or without all ten of them, twice: '6.538472901!-EXP(-6.978245310)' RE: Pandigital e - Gerson W. Barbosa - 01-01-2017 11:10 AM (01-01-2017 11:03 AM)Paul Dale Wrote:(01-01-2017 10:44 AM)Gerson W. Barbosa Wrote: \(\lfloor 6.538472901! \rfloor \) I know, but the family gathering would not be complete without the patriarchs :-) |