Why not the long-lasting 15 - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum) +-- Forum: HP Calculators (and very old HP Computers) (/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: General Forum (/forum-4.html) +--- Thread: Why not the long-lasting 15 (/thread-7974.html) |
Why not the long-lasting 15 - Matt Agajanian - 03-18-2017 06:56 PM Hi all. Several thoughts are running through my mind as to why the only V'Ger (I know, Voyager. Yup, A Trekdom reference) hasn't endured the same manufacturing lifespan of the 12C. Thoughts: 1--Was the 15C-LE too buggy as to seal the demise of a resurgence of the 15C 2--Despite the lack of matrices support, since the 35S and 33S were robust with RAM, was a 448-byte 15C too limiting? 3--Now that we had the 48 Series and 50G, and their feature sets included dynamic RPN stack, matrices as well as symbolic mathematics & calculus, these were far more versatile than the 15C or the LE? 4--Although engineering and users in the sciences are numerous and loyal to HP, the 12C's user base was far more established and populated than an RPN or 41/15 user base? So, what are the reasons why the 12C is the longest running Voyager series calculator? Thanks RE: Why not the long-lasting 15 - Dave Frederickson - 03-18-2017 07:11 PM (03-18-2017 06:56 PM)Matt Agajanian Wrote: So, what are the reasons why the 12C is the longest running Voyager series calculator? CPA's. RE: Why not the long-lasting 15 - bhtooefr - 03-24-2017 07:49 PM To expand on that... arguably, HP got even more market lock-in for the 12C in the accounting market back in the day, than TI has gotten for the 81/82/83/83+/84+ family in the educational market. After all, while textbooks may include button sequences to get the right answer out of a TI calculator, I don't think there's any legal documents that quote the 83+ or 84+ owner's manual as the way that a value was derived... |