Odd HP-35 Red Dot - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum) +-- Forum: HP Calculators (and very old HP Computers) (/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: General Forum (/forum-4.html) +--- Thread: Odd HP-35 Red Dot (/thread-9167.html) |
Odd HP-35 Red Dot - aj04062 - 09-27-2017 11:55 PM Well I picked up this Red Dot the other day. I am confident in saying this even though it looks like a V4 HP-35. https://www.flickr.com/photos/155473427@N08/36652056184/in/dateposted-public/ SN is 1143A000364 https://www.flickr.com/photos/155473427@N08/37331046612/in/dateposted-public/ The ENTIRE front side has been replaced. I had to inspect the inside to see what the board looked like. https://www.flickr.com/photos/155473427@N08/37104866650/in/dateposted-public/ To my surprise it is an early board (note 03-72 date plus 1211 marking). This older thread from a very early 35 had the same markings on the board. http://www.hpmuseum.org/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/hpmuseum/archv020.cgi?read=212650 I guess this guy must've gone in for a major overhaul in '79 (see sticker on the CPU) RE: Odd HP-35 Red Dot - jebem - 09-28-2017 12:15 PM (09-27-2017 11:55 PM)aj04062 Wrote: Well I picked up this Red Dot the other day. I am confident in saying this even though it looks like a V4 HP-35. It's always a pleasure to look to these machines internals and reconfirm the high quality of the 70's technologies. Mine is not a red dot for sure. Also it has got a PCB date code of 40 73, and one of the ROM ICs is marked with 7344 (1973 week 44): http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-pyNvbIEGkAY/VCMFfreaCEI/AAAAAAAACKU/a1ETTh5g7eA/s1600/SAM_7888.JPG But looking to your PCB, it seems that at least one of the ROM ICs is marked as "7303" (1973 week 03). Would this still qualify it as a red dot? Can you check if some of the ICs solder joints where manually re-soldered? If yes, then probably someone have rebuilt it in 1979.... Edited to add this: Does your machine have the famous "exp(ln(2.02) = 2" bug of the early firmware? RE: Odd HP-35 Red Dot - aj04062 - 09-29-2017 09:56 PM It is clear to me this went back for rework. I am guessing that the 7303 ROM was replaced to fix the "bug" which it does not have. The solder job on the board is excellent. Before I removed the rear label, it does not look like it was ever molested. (09-28-2017 12:15 PM)jebem Wrote:(09-27-2017 11:55 PM)aj04062 Wrote: Well I picked up this Red Dot the other day. I am confident in saying this even though it looks like a V4 HP-35. RE: Odd HP-35 Red Dot - Dave Frederickson - 09-29-2017 11:21 PM (09-29-2017 09:56 PM)aj04062 Wrote: Before I removed the rear label, it does not look like it was ever molested. I mucked up the label on my 35 forty years ago when I was a dumbass kid. Had to remove the screws under the label which hold the case together so I could see what was inside. Since then I've replaced the label with one from a donor. So, Adam, how did you open the case without removing the label? Dave RE: Odd HP-35 Red Dot - aj04062 - 09-29-2017 11:53 PM I remove the label with some heat from a spotlight and muscle. I then soak in iso alcohol to get the old adhesive off. Then roll to flatten out the wrinkles and lastly apply new 3M adhesive to the back. (09-29-2017 11:21 PM)Dave Frederickson Wrote:(09-29-2017 09:56 PM)aj04062 Wrote: Before I removed the rear label, it does not look like it was ever molested. RE: Odd HP-35 Red Dot - Dave Frederickson - 09-30-2017 01:08 AM (09-29-2017 11:53 PM)aj04062 Wrote: I remove the label with some heat from a spotlight and muscle. I then soak in iso alcohol to get the old adhesive off. Then roll to flatten out the wrinkles and lastly apply new 3M adhesive to the back. Whoops! Past tense. I thought you were commenting on the condition of the label after you opened the case. I was fortunate enough to have the adhesive on the donor label intact after removal. All I needed to do was smooth the label, moisten the adhesive with alcohol, and apply to the 35. Dave |