![]() |
Change in CHOOSE behaviour between 8151 and 11586 (Android) (KNOWN) - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum) +-- Forum: HP Calculators (and very old HP Computers) (/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: HP Prime (/forum-5.html) +--- Thread: Change in CHOOSE behaviour between 8151 and 11586 (Android) (KNOWN) (/thread-9473.html) |
Change in CHOOSE behaviour between 8151 and 11586 (Android) (KNOWN) - StephenG1CMZ - 11-10-2017 09:42 PM Version 0.3 of my Z_LIGHTS program exhibited different behaviour on 8151 and 11586 (both on Android). In both systems, the behaviour documented in the on-device help is that if the user cancels a selection without choosing a selection, 0 is returned in the CHOOSE variable. That was the behaviour observed in 8151, where Version 0.3 of Z_LIGHTS worked as expected. In 11586 however, the previous value in the CHOOSE variable is repeated. A workaround for this changed behaviour is incorporated in Z_LIGHTS V0.4. Is this change intended (in which case the on-device help needs clarification)? RE: Change in CHOOSE behaviour between 8151 and 11586 (Android) - StephenG1CMZ - 11-10-2017 09:56 PM This change in behaviour has previously been noted here: http://www.hpmuseum.org/forum/thread-7187.html?highlight=CHOOSE I raised it again because I asked about why there was a problem with Z_LIGHTS V0.3, before narrowing down the cause to a CHOOSE, and re-discovering its change in behaviour. RE: Change in CHOOSE behaviour between 8151 and 11586 (Android) (KNOWN) - Carlos295pz - 11-11-2017 12:14 AM Your algorithms are entangled, the general way to use CHOOSE would be something like that for the EXPORT Z_LIGHTS() Code: EXPORT Z_LIGHTS() Implement it like this in the other selection loops RE: Change in CHOOSE behaviour between 8151 and 11586 (Android) (KNOWN) - Tim Wessman - 11-13-2017 02:53 PM Hello, The behavior as implemented is correct and has now been in force longer then the "original" I believe. The less disruptive thing to do is just tweak the help to make it a bit more clear. |