(28/48/50) Lambert W Function
|
01-30-2024, 04:04 PM
Post: #41
|
|||
|
|||
RE: (28/48/50) Lambert W Function
(01-30-2024 02:52 PM)Gil Wrote: FNL= Again, FNL is a recursive function! I don't know RPL, but the fact it started with WHILE already look wrong. Also, FNL is unsuitable for big x. (excess recursions cause unnessary rounding errors) For big x, return LOGP1(X)-X, or simply LN(1+X)-X, is faster and better. Again, please read thread: Accurate x - log(1+x) If your question is only about accurate log(1+x)-x, please posted there. |
|||
01-31-2024, 07:10 PM
Post: #42
|
|||
|
|||
RE: (28/48/50) Lambert W Function
John,
Great your LambertW implementation! Comparing your results with my proper HP50G program, I think that for special cases like: k=-1 & input x tiny like {x=-1E-496 or x=-1E-497 or x=-1E-497 or x=-1E-499 } or k=0 and x=1E-499 your program cannot give a correct answer. Almost a pity. Regards, Gil |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)