DB48X: HP48-like RPL implementation for DM42
|
11-19-2024, 05:37 AM
Post: #461
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DB48X: HP48-like RPL implementation for DM42
(11-18-2024 08:01 AM)c3d Wrote: Replying here to a private message containing bug reports.Thank you once again for your incredible creation. I’ve thoroughly enjoyed using it, and I appreciate the dedication and support you provide to the community. This is my first time writing here, and while I’m still learning the best ways to engage, I hope to improve over time. Thank you for your patience as I share my feedback and suggestions below: XRange and YRange Input Initially, I was unclear about how to input a range for XRange and YRange, which led me to enter a single value like 5. This caused some issues. I’ve now learned the correct method (e.g., -5 r/s 5) and will proceed accordingly. Hatched Black Screen Issue When attempting to plot certain equations, the screen displayed a hatched black pattern. The same issue occurred when using the SHOW command. If this behavior persists, I’ll try to provide a reproducible case for further investigation. Matrix Summation Issue The issue I encountered with summing two 2x3 matrices has been resolved in version 0.8.6. Thank you for the fix. I’ll continue testing, and if any additional issues arise, I’ll report them. History Function Feedback I understand and appreciate the Hist option and its ability to access the last 8 inputs. However, my concern lies in cases like the following example: Input xeq -> 'sqrt(12)' -> Enter -> 1/x. At this point, the stack visually displays 1/(sqrt(12)), which is helpful. Upon pressing r/s, the evaluated value is shown on the stack. If I then hold Down and F2, the history incorrectly retrieves 'sqrt(12)' instead of 1/(sqrt(12)). This seems to be a limitation in the current implementation. Having the ability to edit the exact formula from the evaluated value on the stack would be extremely beneficial, especially for users like me who often work with complex formulas and frequently make adjustments. Editing Indicator Suggestion While I understand the purpose of the editing indicator (e.g., the letter D for direct entry mode), I believe much of this information is already given through other visual elements on the screen. For example: The top corner indicates whether uppercase or lowercase text is active. The brackets already visually suggest when the user is editing inside a bracket. My suggestion is to offer an option for alternate indicator styles (e.g., a simple dot . or underscore _) for users like me who find the current implementation less intuitive since without this information calculator is fully functional. If creating this option is not possible, I would appreciate guidance on how to create a patch myself to customize this behavior. Thank you again for your incredible work and for considering these suggestions. I look forward to your feedback and guidance. |
|||
11-19-2024, 08:57 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-19-2024 08:57 AM by c3d.)
Post: #462
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DB48X: HP48-like RPL implementation for DM42
(11-18-2024 08:01 AM)c3d Wrote: Replying here to a private message containing bug reports. I forgot to mention: if you are OK with a fully black cursor or fully white cursor, you can try: Code:
You can vary the customization. Maybe with the existing parameters you can get a block cursor to your liking, something like: Code:
There are other parameters that you can pla with. DB48X,HP,me |
|||
11-19-2024, 09:01 AM
Post: #463
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DB48X: HP48-like RPL implementation for DM42
(11-18-2024 10:10 PM)LinusSch Wrote: I've finally arrived at the point where I try to run You forgot to do: Code:
DB48X,HP,me |
|||
11-19-2024, 09:04 AM
Post: #464
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DB48X: HP48-like RPL implementation for DM42
(11-18-2024 09:13 PM)battlecoder Wrote: First, I want to express my gratitude to anyone involved in this project. I've been recently reading about it, and checking the web version of DB48X and I love it. I've been also watching Christophe's superb presentation (I'm like 80% done. Been watching it between breaks) and many of the annoyances and missing features in other calculators pointed out by the presenter are things that I've also noticed, but couldn't have solved as elegantly as DB48X does, even if I had decided to write programs to solve them. Or a DM42n, same hardware with different keys. Quote:So I have a couple of questions: At this point, the feature set is quasi-identical. We are close to the limit, but I'm starting to think that we might be able to complete the HP48 feature set, and be close to the HP50 feature set by delegating things to the library. Quote:What about the DM42n? Is the DB50X going to be available on that hardware eventually? No, sorry. It is not going to be available on that hardware eventually for a very good reason: it is available on that hardware today. DB48X,HP,me |
|||
11-19-2024, 10:54 AM
Post: #465
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DB48X: HP48-like RPL implementation for DM42
(11-19-2024 03:42 AM)battlecoder Wrote: [...] Just take a look at #133 in the relevant thread |
|||
11-19-2024, 03:56 PM
Post: #466
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DB48X: HP48-like RPL implementation for DM42
(11-19-2024 09:04 AM)c3d Wrote:Quote:What about the DM42n? Is the DB50X going to be available on that hardware eventually?No, sorry. It is not going to be available on that hardware eventually for a very good reason: it is available on that hardware today. Got me confused and concerned for the first half, not gonna lie! Thanks for the extra confirmation that it works on the DM42n, as well as answering my other questions ~ (11-19-2024 10:54 AM)raprism Wrote:Thanks! Given the slightly different keyboard layout of the DM32 I assumed it needed a different overlay. This clarified things greatly.(11-19-2024 03:42 AM)battlecoder Wrote: [...] |
|||
11-19-2024, 04:17 PM
Post: #467
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DB48X: HP48-like RPL implementation for DM42
Hello, I partly agree
One suggestion can be to have in data entry mode the mode to the far left and a couple of spaces before the number entry: Example: D 813.23 if switch the mode, the far left mode indicator can change. P 813.23 << and so on... this way it does not have to be blinking also. Quote:Can you elaborate on why you think it would be great? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)