Why did they separate Cas and non-cas?
|
02-16-2014, 02:24 AM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Why did they separate Cas and non-cas?
I googled and searched this forum without finding a satisfying answer. What are the advantages of separating the two modes?
|
|||
02-16-2014, 02:53 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Why did they separate Cas and non-cas?
A discussion on that topic was held last December before the board went to the new software: http://www.hpmuseum.org/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/...591#257591
<0|ɸ|0> -Joe- |
|||
02-16-2014, 03:25 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Why did they separate Cas and non-cas?
Is that it? It boils down to me either wanting 3.46... or 2*sqrt(3)? Why not just something more like press enter for exact and shift enter for approx? (I don't even have the calculator yet it arrives Monday, but I really need to hit the ground running with it)
Can I turn off the default setting that each variable is initialized as 0 in the home mode? Im scared I forget about that in an exam. |
|||
02-16-2014, 08:44 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Why did they separate Cas and non-cas?
(02-16-2014 03:25 AM)DeucesAx Wrote: Is that it? It boils down to me either wanting 3.46... or 2*sqrt(3)? Why not just something more like press enter for exact and shift enter for approx? Good news: They must have either read your mind, or you read theirs. You can do exactly what you suggested in CAS. Check it out: \(\sqrt{12}\) Enter --> \(2\sqrt{3}\) \(\sqrt{12}\) Shift Enter --> 3.46410161514 \(\sqrt{12}\) Enter [a b/c] --> both answers (best of both worlds!) HP made it exactly the way you suggested. Cool, huh? Quote:Can I turn off the default setting that each variable is initialized as 0 in the home mode? No, because the built-in Home variables are like the 4 stack levels in traditional RPN calculators, always existing and always containing something. Prime's A through Z always exist, and contain zero until you replace the zero with some other real number; Z0 through Z9 always exist and contain zero until you store a complex number in them; and so on. Quote:Im scared I forget about that in an exam. No problem: to avoid accidentally using a variable that you didn't initialize, stick to user-created variables, which can nicely have descriptive names, and do not exist until you store something in them, and cease to exist when they are deleted. <0|ɸ|0> -Joe- |
|||
02-16-2014, 02:46 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-16-2014 02:56 PM by Dominik Holenstein.)
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Why did they separate Cas and non-cas?
Here is a similar apporach if Exact is checked in your CAS settings:
\(\sqrt{12}\) Enter --> \(2\sqrt{3}\) --> symbolic result [a b/c] --> 3.46410161514 --> numeric result [a b/c] --> 3650401 / 1053780 --> exact result See the attached screenshot. Best, Dominik |
|||
02-19-2014, 03:18 AM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Why did they separate Cas and non-cas?
Thank you. I guess for now Ill just use the CAS mode at all times.
Could you give some examples where it would be advantageous to use both at the same time? |
|||
02-22-2014, 05:33 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-22-2014 05:56 PM by eried.)
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Why did they separate Cas and non-cas?
:O maybe this separation (illogical from an engineer viewpoint) was to offer the ability to block the CAS :O? (I realized this thinking on how TI handled this... 2 different calculators, one without CAS, one with... a much worse decision, imagine if you got the non-cas as a gift, instant boomer; but at last something kinda required by education viewpoint)
My website: ried.cl |
|||
02-23-2014, 09:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-23-2014 09:57 PM by John R. Graham.)
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Why did they separate Cas and non-cas?
One other nuance is that CAS mode doesn't currently support RPN entry: if you want exact results, you're stuck with algebraic entry—and extra keystrokes.
- John |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)