CAS: simplify terms seperately?
|
09-09-2018, 08:02 PM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: CAS: simplify terms seperately?
(09-09-2018 06:43 PM)parisse Wrote: Sorry, but "standard form" is not very descriptive. I think defining "standard form" that meets most cases will take some work, and at least a list of examples. (It might be possible to do everything in xcas programming language, possibly iterating over terms using the Q[a,b,c] notation, or maybe just using lin() and the like.) In my particular instance, lin(normal(...)) matches the textbook -- thanks!. I will play around with other equations later today. It might also be that someone (me?) writes a guide to getting xcas results into "standard form" for EE etc., and that everything is there already. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
CAS: simplify terms seperately? - wsprague - 09-09-2018, 05:24 AM
RE: CAS: simplify terms seperately? - parisse - 09-09-2018, 06:06 AM
RE: CAS: simplify terms seperately? - Anders - 09-09-2018, 03:17 PM
RE: CAS: simplify terms seperately? - wsprague - 09-09-2018, 05:18 PM
RE: CAS: simplify terms seperately? - Anders - 09-09-2018, 06:39 PM
RE: CAS: simplify terms seperately? - parisse - 09-09-2018, 06:43 PM
RE: CAS: simplify terms seperately? - wsprague - 09-09-2018 08:02 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)