HP Forums / HP Calculators (and very old HP Computers) / General Forum v / Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX

Post Reply 
Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX
05-05-2014, 12:02 AM
Post: #7
Mark Hardman Offline
Senior Member
 		Posts: 525
Joined: Dec 2013
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX
(05-04-2014 10:56 PM)Christoph Giesselink Wrote:  
(05-03-2014 01:57 AM)Mark Hardman Wrote:  HP-28C
1LK7 Saturn CPU (1 MHz)

Sorry, this is wrong.

(05-03-2014 01:57 AM)Mark Hardman Wrote:  HP-48GX
Yorke (00048-80063, 160 pin QFP), 4 MHz

This is also a mistake.

I will pass the corrections back to Craig.

Mark Hardman
Ceci n'est pas une signature.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - Mark Hardman - 05-05-2014 12:02 AM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - RMollov - 06-22-2020, 04:48 AM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - KimH - 06-17-2020, 11:43 AM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - KimH - 06-17-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - KimH - 06-17-2020, 02:12 PM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - KimH - 06-18-2020, 06:09 AM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - KimH - 06-18-2020, 07:08 AM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - HP67 - 05-05-2014, 01:42 PM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - rprosperi - 06-17-2020, 10:23 PM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - KimH - 06-19-2020, 04:40 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)

Contact Us | The Museum of HP Calculators | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication