(12C Platinum) Normal Distribution
|
12-02-2018, 06:59 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2018 07:38 PM by Dieter.)
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: (12C Platinum) Normal Distribution
(12-02-2018 09:11 AM)Dieter Wrote: Fine, even with less digits. But it can still be tweaked a bit: There now is a new approximation with focus on the absolute error. But in a somewhat different way: With the following coefficients the error is less than 6,5 units in the 7th significant digit. a1 = 0,4367117 a2 = 0,0851264 a3 = -9,34575 E-5 b1 = 2,46927 b2 = 1,1397766 b3 = 0,2085059 The valid domain is even a bit wider than before: the above error threshold is maintained up to x=5,1993..., which is the point where the CDF reaches 1 E–7. Which is easy to memorize: any result down to 1 E–7 has an error less than 7 units in its 7th significant digit. ;-) This rational approximation can be complemented with the above CF expansion. Replace the constant 0,66 with 0,6444 and switch between both methods at x=5. This way the error stays below 7 units in the 7th significant digit for all x≥0. Dieter |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
(12C Platinum) Normal Distribution - Gamo - 12-01-2018, 07:53 AM
RE: (12C Platinum) Normal Distribution - Dieter - 12-01-2018, 10:59 AM
RE: (12C Platinum) Normal Distribution - Albert Chan - 12-01-2018, 05:37 PM
RE: (12C Platinum) Normal Distribution - Dieter - 12-01-2018, 07:44 PM
RE: (12C Platinum) Normal Distribution - Albert Chan - 12-01-2018, 11:16 PM
RE: (12C Platinum) Normal Distribution - Dieter - 12-02-2018, 09:11 AM
RE: (12C Platinum) Normal Distribution - Dieter - 12-02-2018 06:59 PM
RE: (12C Platinum) Normal Distribution - Albert Chan - 12-02-2018, 08:14 PM
RE: (12C Platinum) Normal Distribution - Dieter - 12-02-2018, 09:43 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)