logₓy
|
01-13-2019, 10:28 AM
Post: #15
|
|||
|
|||
RE:logᵧx
(01-13-2019 12:40 AM)Gerson W. Barbosa Wrote: LOGx(y) sounds more natural to me: We write \(\log_b(x)\) and Mathematica uses: Quote:Log[b,z] Thus my intuition is to use: logy(x) Exactly as you suggested. (01-13-2019 08:47 AM)Dieter Wrote: Yes, and I'm glad it is defined this way on the WP34s. No, it's sad it is defined this way on the WP-34s. Cheers Thomas |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
RE: logₓy - Jeff_Kearns - 01-15-2019, 08:15 PM
RE: logₓy - Valentin Albillo - 01-12-2019, 10:49 PM
RE: logₓy - Valentin Albillo - 01-13-2019, 02:13 AM
RE: logₓy - Gerson W. Barbosa - 01-13-2019, 12:40 AM
RE: logₓy - StephenG1CMZ - 01-13-2019, 09:58 AM
RE:logᵧx - Thomas Klemm - 01-13-2019 10:28 AM
RE: logₓy - Ángel Martin - 01-14-2019, 03:57 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)