Post Reply 
logₓy
01-13-2019, 10:28 AM
Post: #15
RE:logᵧx
(01-13-2019 12:40 AM)Gerson W. Barbosa Wrote:  LOGx(y) sounds more natural to me:

We write \(\log_b(x)\) and Mathematica uses:
Quote:Log[b,z]
gives the logarithm to base b.

Thus my intuition is to use: logy(x)
Exactly as you suggested.

(01-13-2019 08:47 AM)Dieter Wrote:  Yes, and I'm glad it is defined this way on the WP34s.

No, it's sad it is defined this way on the WP-34s.

Cheers
Thomas
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
logₓy - cdmackay - 01-12-2019, 09:09 PM
RE: logₓy - pier4r - 01-12-2019, 09:12 PM
RE: logₓy - Jeff_Kearns - 01-15-2019, 08:15 PM
RE: logₓy - cdmackay - 01-12-2019, 09:45 PM
RE: logₓy - Benjer - 01-12-2019, 10:42 PM
RE: logₓy - Valentin Albillo - 01-12-2019, 10:49 PM
RE: logₓy - cdmackay - 01-13-2019, 12:01 AM
RE: logₓy - rprosperi - 01-13-2019, 01:29 AM
RE: logₓy - Valentin Albillo - 01-13-2019, 02:13 AM
RE: logₓy - Gerson W. Barbosa - 01-13-2019, 12:40 AM
RE: logₓy - cdmackay - 01-13-2019, 03:19 AM
RE: logₓy - Dieter - 01-13-2019, 08:47 AM
RE: logₓy - pier4r - 01-13-2019, 09:11 AM
RE: logₓy - grsbanks - 01-13-2019, 09:49 AM
RE: logₓy - StephenG1CMZ - 01-13-2019, 09:58 AM
RE:logᵧx - Thomas Klemm - 01-13-2019 10:28 AM
RE: logₓy - Paul Dale - 01-13-2019, 11:07 AM
RE: logₓy - Dieter - 01-13-2019, 12:56 PM
RE: logₓy - Ángel Martin - 01-14-2019, 03:57 PM
RE: logₓy - cdmackay - 01-13-2019, 07:40 PM
RE: logₓy - cdmackay - 01-15-2019, 06:07 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)