Post Reply 
logₓy
01-13-2019, 07:40 PM
Post: #18
RE: logₓy
I apologise to those who prefer the other ordering/labelling Smile

I don't think I gave it much thought, but my naive thinking involved seeing e.g. log₂ as the function, and I normally use x to denote the input of f(), leaving y as the base.

but I quite see the alternative, especially when you consider it as a function with two arguments, which of course it is.

thanks!

PS and I would normally write x-to-the-y, but it's often y-to-the-x on calculators.

Cambridge, UK
41CL/DM41X 12/15C/16C DM15/16 17B/II/II+ 28S 42S/DM42 32SII 48GX 50g 35s WP34S PrimeG2 WP43S/pilot/C47
Casio, Rockwell 18R
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
logₓy - cdmackay - 01-12-2019, 09:09 PM
RE: logₓy - pier4r - 01-12-2019, 09:12 PM
RE: logₓy - Jeff_Kearns - 01-15-2019, 08:15 PM
RE: logₓy - cdmackay - 01-12-2019, 09:45 PM
RE: logₓy - Benjer - 01-12-2019, 10:42 PM
RE: logₓy - Valentin Albillo - 01-12-2019, 10:49 PM
RE: logₓy - cdmackay - 01-13-2019, 12:01 AM
RE: logₓy - rprosperi - 01-13-2019, 01:29 AM
RE: logₓy - Valentin Albillo - 01-13-2019, 02:13 AM
RE: logₓy - Gerson W. Barbosa - 01-13-2019, 12:40 AM
RE: logₓy - cdmackay - 01-13-2019, 03:19 AM
RE: logₓy - Dieter - 01-13-2019, 08:47 AM
RE: logₓy - pier4r - 01-13-2019, 09:11 AM
RE: logₓy - grsbanks - 01-13-2019, 09:49 AM
RE: logₓy - StephenG1CMZ - 01-13-2019, 09:58 AM
RE:logᵧx - Thomas Klemm - 01-13-2019, 10:28 AM
RE: logₓy - Paul Dale - 01-13-2019, 11:07 AM
RE: logₓy - Dieter - 01-13-2019, 12:56 PM
RE: logₓy - Ángel Martin - 01-14-2019, 03:57 PM
RE: logₓy - cdmackay - 01-13-2019 07:40 PM
RE: logₓy - cdmackay - 01-15-2019, 06:07 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)