logₓy
|
01-13-2019, 07:40 PM
Post: #18
|
|||
|
|||
RE: logₓy
I apologise to those who prefer the other ordering/labelling
I don't think I gave it much thought, but my naive thinking involved seeing e.g. log₂ as the function, and I normally use x to denote the input of f(), leaving y as the base. but I quite see the alternative, especially when you consider it as a function with two arguments, which of course it is. thanks! PS and I would normally write x-to-the-y, but it's often y-to-the-x on calculators. Cambridge, UK 41CL/DM41X 12/15C/16C DM15/16 17B/II/II+ 28S 42S/DM42 32SII 48GX 50g 35s WP34S PrimeG2 WP43S/pilot/C47 Casio, Rockwell 18R |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
RE: logₓy - Jeff_Kearns - 01-15-2019, 08:15 PM
RE: logₓy - Valentin Albillo - 01-12-2019, 10:49 PM
RE: logₓy - Valentin Albillo - 01-13-2019, 02:13 AM
RE: logₓy - Gerson W. Barbosa - 01-13-2019, 12:40 AM
RE: logₓy - StephenG1CMZ - 01-13-2019, 09:58 AM
RE:logᵧx - Thomas Klemm - 01-13-2019, 10:28 AM
RE: logₓy - Ángel Martin - 01-14-2019, 03:57 PM
RE: logₓy - cdmackay - 01-13-2019 07:40 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)