Solve question

[Tim Wessman]

(05-23-2014 08:04 AM)Manolo Sobrino Wrote:  No Tim, that is (or should be) completely intentional, unless you understand that the X in the integrand is a dummy variable, but this is in fact an abuse of notation as a definite integral in which you integrate over a variable which is also a limit makes no sense(*).

Indeed. I am in 100% agreement there. I was thinking more along the lines of making that some sort of error message to enforce/educate that you shouldn't be doing that rather then making it allowed. It was just very poorly worded being written right before bed.

Right now, the X variable doesn't show up as one you can solve for (correctly) but I can see how this would be confusing since there is no explanation as to why it isn't there. Hence a bit more information/error would be a helpful thing. That is more what I was referring to instead.