An (i) for an i—29C’s usage
|
08-23-2019, 06:15 PM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
An (i) for an i—29C’s usage
Hi all
As the 67 uses I for the storage directly into the I register and (i) was the indirection usage, why was the 19/29C’s i operator used for indirection operations (GTO i GSB i), etc.) and not (i) like the 67/97? Thanks |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
An (i) for an i—29C’s usage - Matt Agajanian - 08-23-2019 06:15 PM
RE: An (i) for an i—29C’s usage - Thomas Okken - 08-24-2019, 12:00 AM
RE: An (i) for an i—29C’s usage - Matt Agajanian - 08-24-2019, 12:36 AM
RE: An (i) for an i—29C’s usage - Archilog - 08-24-2019, 01:46 AM
RE: An (i) for an i—29C’s usage - Matt Agajanian - 08-24-2019, 05:10 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)