An (i) for an i—29C’s usage
|
08-24-2019, 01:46 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: An (i) for an i—29C’s usage
Hello,
As an old user of the 29c (since 83), I never have had problems to use those two sides of the Indirect Register; the reciprocal is not true: when I many years later acquired a 67, the use of I or (i) were - and nowadays is - problematic. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
An (i) for an i—29C’s usage - Matt Agajanian - 08-23-2019, 06:15 PM
RE: An (i) for an i—29C’s usage - Thomas Okken - 08-24-2019, 12:00 AM
RE: An (i) for an i—29C’s usage - Matt Agajanian - 08-24-2019, 12:36 AM
RE: An (i) for an i—29C’s usage - Archilog - 08-24-2019 01:46 AM
RE: An (i) for an i—29C’s usage - Matt Agajanian - 08-24-2019, 05:10 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)