HP-29C: 98 Program Steps, So, why not an even 100?
|
08-31-2019, 04:52 PM
Post: #22
|
|||
|
|||
RE: HP-29C: 98 Program Steps, So, why not an even 100?
(08-27-2019 11:18 PM)striegel Wrote:(08-26-2019 07:21 PM)Matt Agajanian Wrote: ... the SR-56 had a 100 step program memory, why was the 29C program memory 98 steps?The HP programming model was more efficient due to RPN and merging steps. e.g. STO 0 on an HP was one step vs. two steps for the TI model. I agree on all points. It’s impressive that HP was able to develop and implement fully merged keystrokes after the Classics lineage. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)