INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S
|
10-11-2019, 02:01 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S
I think the 32S implements what most would consider the 'right way' to behave, if unhindered with legacy behavior, while the 42S, positioned as the 41C successor and ostensibly compatible with existing 41C code, did not have the freedom to behave logically. There are other similar issues where the 42S leans back towards 41C behavior while the 32S/32SII/33S/35S, etc. lean towards more evolved thinking.
--Bob Prosperi |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - Dave Britten - 10-11-2019, 01:49 PM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - rprosperi - 10-11-2019 02:01 PM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - Thomas Okken - 10-19-2019, 09:39 PM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - Dave Britten - 10-19-2019, 09:47 PM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - rprosperi - 10-20-2019, 01:46 AM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - Thomas Okken - 10-20-2019, 03:27 AM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - ijabbott - 10-11-2019, 04:20 PM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - Dave Britten - 10-11-2019, 04:35 PM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - Valentin Albillo - 10-11-2019, 05:12 PM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - Dave Britten - 10-15-2019, 07:35 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)