INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S
|
10-11-2019, 04:35 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S
(10-11-2019 04:20 PM)ijabbott Wrote: I guess a program shouldn't really trust anything on the stack apart from X after halting for input. The user may have done some calculations (buggering up the old stack contents) before pressing R/S to continue. Yeah, that's very sound advice, though shortcuts like that are somewhat forgivable on the 32S where memory comes at a premium. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - Dave Britten - 10-11-2019, 01:49 PM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - rprosperi - 10-11-2019, 02:01 PM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - Thomas Okken - 10-19-2019, 09:39 PM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - Dave Britten - 10-19-2019, 09:47 PM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - rprosperi - 10-20-2019, 01:46 AM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - Thomas Okken - 10-20-2019, 03:27 AM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - ijabbott - 10-11-2019, 04:20 PM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - Dave Britten - 10-11-2019 04:35 PM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - Valentin Albillo - 10-11-2019, 05:12 PM
RE: INPUT stack lift: 32S vs. 42S - Dave Britten - 10-15-2019, 07:35 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)