Free42 LSTO REGS

[Epidiah]

(10-23-2019 12:01 PM)Thomas Okken Wrote:  Thoughts? Would LRTN be a good name, or can someone suggest something better, i.e. a better name for that function, or an altogether better way to fix this LSTO limitation?

Would a LXEQ be feasible? Something that would let the program doing the calling decide if it wanted to preserve the local variables from the subroutine?

I feel like that's more flexible, but LRTN does have the advantage of not having to remember which subroutines you want to recall the local variables from.