Post Reply 
42S local label caching
11-13-2019, 02:06 PM
Post: #8
RE: 42S local label caching
(11-12-2019 06:13 AM)Valentin Albillo Wrote:  
(11-11-2019 06:18 PM)Sylvain Cote Wrote:  Until the program is modified or packed, when that happens, all local GTO/XEQ distances are reset to zero
That's correct for the HP-41C family and the HP42S except that there's no packing in the latter.
Thank you Valentin for the information.

I know the HP-41C internal pretty well but my understanding of the HP-42S internal is minimal, I guess it is time to correct that deficiency. Wink
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
42S local label caching - Dave Britten - 11-11-2019, 05:54 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Sylvain Cote - 11-11-2019, 06:18 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Dave Britten - 11-11-2019, 06:56 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Sylvain Cote - 11-13-2019, 02:00 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Sylvain Cote - 11-13-2019 02:06 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Andres - 11-11-2019, 07:06 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Dave Britten - 11-11-2019, 07:28 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Sylvain Cote - 11-14-2019, 04:00 AM
RE: 42S local label caching - Joe Horn - 11-14-2019, 10:54 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Sylvain Cote - 11-15-2019, 05:42 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Joe Horn - 11-15-2019, 09:48 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Sylvain Cote - 11-16-2019, 03:25 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Werner - 11-16-2019, 04:50 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Sylvain Cote - 11-16-2019, 11:33 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Sylvain Cote - 11-16-2019, 11:22 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Joe Horn - 11-17-2019, 12:50 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Werner - 11-17-2019, 09:37 AM
RE: 42S local label caching - J-F Garnier - 11-17-2019, 09:51 AM
RE: 42S local label caching - Werner - 11-17-2019, 07:03 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)