Wrong description of RPL ENTER?
|
03-14-2020, 11:44 PM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Wrong description of RPL ENTER?
It is perhaps slightly confusing then, that ENTER isn't necessary; e.g. 2 SPC 3 +
Unless we then add that every other operation includes an implicit ENTER? Cambridge, UK 41CL/DM41X 12/15C/16C DM15/16 17B/II/II+ 28S 42S/DM42 32SII 48GX 50g 35s WP34S PrimeG2 WP43S/pilot/C47 Casio, Rockwell 18R |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Wrong description of RPL ENTER? - Orome - 03-14-2020, 07:24 PM
RE: Wrong description of RPL ENTER? - rprosperi - 03-14-2020, 09:20 PM
RE: Wrong description of RPL ENTER? - Orome - 03-14-2020, 09:25 PM
RE: Wrong description of RPL ENTER? - Dave Britten - 03-14-2020, 10:17 PM
RE: Wrong description of RPL ENTER? - cdmackay - 03-14-2020 11:44 PM
RE: Wrong description of RPL ENTER? - Dave Britten - 03-15-2020, 12:09 AM
RE: Wrong description of RPL ENTER? - rprosperi - 03-15-2020, 12:18 AM
RE: Wrong description of RPL ENTER? - Orome - 03-15-2020, 12:22 PM
RE: Wrong description of RPL ENTER? - rprosperi - 03-15-2020, 03:03 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)