Probaby gonna get a ton of flak for this but...
|
04-15-2020, 09:26 AM
Post: #14
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Probaby gonna get a ton of flak for this but...
(04-15-2020 04:54 AM)Steve Simpkin Wrote: The point was that with an algebraic entry calculator you are responsible for knowing how your model will interpret a given equation. They do not all use the same rules. True. IMHO, implied multiplication should be treated the same as an explicit multiplication sign. When you do enter the expression on the fx-CG50 at least it shows you where it inserted parentheses around the implied multiplication to give the answer 2. When you enter 48÷2(9+3) it transforms it into 48÷(2(9+3)) Tom L Cui bono? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)