Post Reply 
tan(pi/2)=-195948537906 (?)
06-09-2020, 09:28 PM
Post: #13
RE: tan(pi/2)=-195948537906 (?)
Interestingly, if you go back to the HP-45 and TI-30, it appears the HP fudges it, but the TI doesn't!

HP 45:
Pi/2 = 1.570796327
tan(Pi/2) = 9.999999999E99 (the overflow display on the HP-45)

TI 30:
Pi/2 = 1.5707963268
tan(Pi/2) = 1.8312E09
tan(1.570796327) = 2.9298E09 (using the HP version of Pi/2)
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
tan(pi/2)=-195948537906 (?) - StephanP - 06-09-2020, 09:25 AM
RE: tan(pi/2)=-195948537906 (?) - Werner - 06-09-2020, 09:36 AM
RE: tan(pi/2)=-195948537906 (?) - Jan 11 - 06-09-2020, 10:04 AM
RE: tan(pi/2)=-195948537906 (?) - StephanP - 06-09-2020, 11:22 AM
RE: tan(pi/2)=-195948537906 (?) - KeithB - 06-09-2020, 03:13 PM
RE: tan(pi/2)=-195948537906 (?) - Werner - 06-09-2020, 01:25 PM
RE: tan(pi/2)=-195948537906 (?) - pinkman - 06-09-2020, 01:51 PM
RE: tan(pi/2)=-195948537906 (?) - Joe Horn - 06-09-2020, 04:30 PM
RE: tan(pi/2)=-195948537906 (?) - pinkman - 06-09-2020, 02:06 PM
RE: tan(pi/2)=-195948537906 (?) - pinkman - 06-09-2020, 06:35 PM
RE: tan(pi/2)=-195948537906 (?) - Dave Britten - 06-09-2020 09:28 PM
RE: tan(pi/2)=-195948537906 (?) - DA74254 - 06-10-2020, 07:40 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)