Post Reply 
Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX
06-18-2020, 08:00 PM (This post was last modified: 06-19-2020 11:40 AM by Christoph Giesselink.)
Post: #25
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX
(06-17-2020 08:44 PM)J-F Garnier Wrote:  
(06-17-2020 12:36 PM)J-F Garnier Wrote:  If it's really a 1LK7 then it's the same than used in the 28C and it supports the PC=(A) opcode. It may be a way to detect the CPU version by software. I may try.

Ok, I had to do it...

Here is the CPUV function that returns 1 if the CPU executes PC=(A), otherwise 0.

I got 0 on my oldest HP71s, but 1 on my 2842Axxx machine.

Note that both Emu71/Win and Emu71/DOS return 1 since they support the new opcodes.

Forth/assembler needed to enter and assemble the CPUV keyword.
J-F

When you don't like to fiddle around with the Forth/Assembler module like me, I added the original sources, sources which can be compiled with the HPTOOLs package and a compiled L71 file for importing with the DOSLINK interface.


Attached File(s)
.zip  CPUVER.zip (Size: 1.43 KB / Downloads: 26)
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - RMollov - 06-22-2020, 04:48 AM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - KimH - 06-17-2020, 11:43 AM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - KimH - 06-17-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - KimH - 06-17-2020, 02:12 PM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - KimH - 06-18-2020, 06:09 AM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - KimH - 06-18-2020, 07:08 AM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - HP67 - 05-05-2014, 01:42 PM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - rprosperi - 06-17-2020, 10:23 PM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - Christoph Giesselink - 06-18-2020 08:00 PM
RE: Benchmarks 71B versus 48GX - KimH - 06-19-2020, 04:40 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)