asc("≤") -> {32,8804,32} ?
|
07-17-2020, 08:09 PM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
RE: asc("≤") -> {32,8804,32} ?
(07-17-2020 08:27 AM)ijabbott Wrote: Would it make more sense for the string to character code sequence (and vice versa) functions to deal with unicode character numbers instead of UTF-8 bytes?This is certainly not an area where I will make changes, because that certainly means a lot of potential errors. And it's not clear for me that Unicode 16 bits encoding is really better than UTF8, both encoding have their advantages and drawbacks, it depends what you are doing. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
asc("≤") -> {32,8804,32} ? - compsystems - 07-14-2020, 01:56 AM
RE: asc("≤") -> {32,8804,32} ? - ijabbott - 07-14-2020, 09:01 AM
RE: asc("≤") -> {32,8804,32} ? - Joe Horn - 07-14-2020, 07:13 PM
RE: asc("≤") -> {32,8804,32} ? - parisse - 07-14-2020, 05:59 PM
RE: asc("≤") -> {32,8804,32} ? - ijabbott - 07-17-2020, 07:49 AM
RE: asc("≤") -> {32,8804,32} ? - parisse - 07-17-2020, 08:05 PM
RE: asc("≤") -> {32,8804,32} ? - DrD - 07-14-2020, 06:56 PM
RE: asc("≤") -> {32,8804,32} ? - parisse - 07-17-2020, 05:01 AM
RE: asc("≤") -> {32,8804,32} ? - ijabbott - 07-17-2020, 08:27 AM
RE: asc("≤") -> {32,8804,32} ? - parisse - 07-17-2020 08:09 PM
RE: asc("≤") -> {32,8804,32} ? - ijabbott - 07-18-2020, 02:38 PM
RE: asc("≤") -> {32,8804,32} ? - Claudio L. - 07-23-2020, 07:08 PM
RE: asc("≤") -> {32,8804,32} ? - ijabbott - 07-24-2020, 10:54 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)