Casio BQ-1100
|
03-07-2021, 10:18 AM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Casio BQ-1100
Hello!
(03-07-2021 06:45 AM)toml_12953 Wrote: If it really was exactly zero, that is statistically significant! No, that "zero correlation" was just a matter of saying... But what I actually did back then (I was in my last two years at school when I got the Ti59) is, that I marked the maxima and minima of the three curves in my calendar, and when we had exams at school or some sports events I compared my scores with the biorhythm. And there was not a single obvious correlation. I also did the same thing with horoscopes and (of course!) got the same result - or better: non result ;-) In my collection I have several biorhythm and astrology and numerology (*) calculators plus a large number of programmable ones, so I could repeat the experiment once again 40 years later. Only that I do no longer get scored for exams and sports so there is no way to compare the results. Regards Max (*) Of the numerology calculators I only have one and I strongly guess that this must be the only one ever made. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Casio BQ-1100 - Leviset - 03-01-2021, 04:25 PM
RE: Casio BQ-1100 - Maximilian Hohmann - 03-01-2021, 09:56 PM
RE: Casio BQ-1100 - Leviset - 03-04-2021, 05:24 PM
RE: Casio BQ-1100 - Maximilian Hohmann - 03-04-2021, 05:49 PM
RE: Casio BQ-1100 - johanw - 03-05-2021, 10:04 PM
RE: Casio BQ-1100 - Leviset - 03-04-2021, 07:45 PM
RE: Casio BQ-1100 - Leviset - 03-05-2021, 03:47 PM
RE: Casio BQ-1100 - Maximilian Hohmann - 03-06-2021, 02:27 PM
RE: Casio BQ-1100 - toml_12953 - 03-07-2021, 06:45 AM
RE: Casio BQ-1100 - Maximilian Hohmann - 03-07-2021 10:18 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)