Serious bug in beta 4/16
|
04-19-2021, 02:17 PM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16
Hello,
It was an uninitialized variable issue.. a flag that was meant to indicate if the CAS. prefix was needed was not always initialized... Depending on what you had in RAM prior to using the function, you could get this or that happening... Cyrille Although I work for the HP calculator group, the views and opinions I post here are my own. I do not speak for HP. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Serious bug in beta 4/16 - jonmoore - 04-18-2021, 06:58 PM
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16 - trojdor - 04-18-2021, 07:21 PM
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16 - TheLastMillennial - 04-18-2021, 07:49 PM
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16 - toml_12953 - 04-18-2021, 08:29 PM
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16 - akmon - 04-18-2021, 09:10 PM
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16 - jonmoore - 04-18-2021, 09:21 PM
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16 - cyrille de brébisson - 04-19-2021, 06:36 AM
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16 - toml_12953 - 04-19-2021, 09:36 AM
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16 - jonmoore - 04-19-2021, 10:41 AM
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16 - cyrille de brébisson - 04-19-2021 02:17 PM
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16 - David Hayden - 04-20-2021, 12:36 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)