Post Reply 
what is wrong with this watch?
04-29-2021, 08:04 PM
Post: #30
RE: what is wrong with this watch?
(04-28-2021 03:47 PM)Thomas Okken Wrote:  The Wikipedia article on Roman numerals gives a good overview on just how little standardization there is, or has indeed ever been, when it comes to the use of subtractive notation.

Even today there seem to be disagreements. Specifically, some people seem to believe that subtractive notation should only be used with the next lower power of 10, while others do not consider that to be a requirement. So, for example, in the closing titles of BBC TV shows, they show the year the program was made using Roman numerals, and as the 20th century drew to a close, I observed both MCMXCIX and MIM for 1999.

So true. Even in elementary school (in the mid/late 70s) we were taught to write IIII instead of IV and even VIIII instead of IX. Later this also included IV and IX. I've seen various forms over the years.

"There are II types of people in the world. Those who understand Roman numerals, and those who do not."

make that

"There are IIIV types of people in the world. Those who understand Roman numerals, and those who do not."

"I count on old friends to remain rational"
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: what is wrong with this watch? - Ren - 04-28-2021, 05:36 PM
RE: what is wrong with this watch? - Ren - 04-28-2021, 05:29 PM
RE: what is wrong with this watch? - robve - 04-29-2021 08:04 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)