Long decimal results instead of scientific notation?
|
06-23-2021, 09:55 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Long decimal results instead of scientific notation?
I would try using the logarithm of the number to create a string of zeroes and padding
the significant numbers to the end. The log of 9.81e-21 is about -20.00833988260. Use the absolute value of the integer. Create a loop to make the zero padded string. Pad the string with 981. There may be a simpler way. It is like programming in c where you have to create your own string functions. I hope this will help get you started. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Long decimal results instead of scientific notation? - matalog - 06-23-2021, 09:08 PM
RE: Long decimal results instead of scientific notation? - rprosperi - 06-23-2021, 09:17 PM
RE: Long decimal results instead of scientific notation? - Liamtoh Resu - 06-23-2021 09:55 PM
RE: Long decimal results instead of scientific notation? - Joe Horn - 06-24-2021, 03:33 AM
RE: Long decimal results instead of scientific notation? - Liamtoh Resu - 06-24-2021, 01:16 PM
RE: Long decimal results instead of scientific notation? - Liamtoh Resu - 06-25-2021, 04:09 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)