(41) HEPAX usage question
|
06-10-2022, 05:12 AM
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
RE: (41) HEPAX usage question
Besides the XROM id# issue that Bob points out, the ZENROM and CCD Module were never compatible with each other (conflicting usage of scratch digits in status regs). This wasn't a big problem since the OS extensions functionality was very similar in both modules, so the main difference was the MC Editor.
With the AMC_OSX we have the same situation, but the MC Editor "gap" does not exist because it includes ROMED. So there's no real reason to use the ZENROM anymore on this context. Cheers "To live or die by your own sword one must first learn to wield it aptly." |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
(41) HEPAX usage question - Werner - 06-08-2022, 04:04 PM
RE: (41) HEPAX usage question - Massimo Gnerucci - 06-08-2022, 06:39 PM
RE: (41) HEPAX usage question - Werner - 06-09-2022, 06:51 AM
RE: (41) HEPAX usage question - Massimo Gnerucci - 06-09-2022, 07:24 AM
RE: (41) HEPAX usage question - Ángel Martin - 06-09-2022, 07:15 AM
RE: (41) HEPAX usage question - Ángel Martin - 06-09-2022, 07:20 AM
RE: (41) HEPAX usage question - Werner - 06-09-2022, 08:20 AM
RE: (41) HEPAX usage question - rprosperi - 06-09-2022, 11:58 AM
RE: (41) HEPAX usage question - Werner - 06-09-2022, 12:26 PM
RE: (41) HEPAX usage question - rprosperi - 06-09-2022, 06:25 PM
RE: (41) HEPAX usage question - Ángel Martin - 06-10-2022 05:12 AM
RE: (41) HEPAX usage question - Werner - 06-10-2022, 06:43 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)