Numerical integration methods
|
08-01-2022, 03:01 PM
Post: #25
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Numerical integration methods
(08-01-2022 03:43 AM)Wes Loewer Wrote: For instance, why *(err1/err2)^2 ? Why not *(err1/err2) or *(err1/err2)^3 ? Was ^2 derived mathematically, or experimentally? I'm guessing it was experimentally determined to give a reasonable error approximation. This is my guess ... err1 = k1 * h^15 err2 = k2 * h^7 integral error estimate = err1*(err1/err2)^2 = k1*(k1/k2)^2 * h^(15+8*2) = k * h^31 If (k, k1, k2) are similar in size, constant term matched too. Exponents cannot be picked in random; it had to produce O(h^31) on the right. If we use 5 or 7 nodes, instead of square, it would need some non-integer exponents. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)