The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug
|
09-10-2022, 12:23 AM
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug
I owned one of the first manufactured HP35 calculators and received a certified letter from HP, just 1 or 2 months after receiving the calculator, alerting me to the computational bug: if e (epsilon) is raised to the 0.000200 exactly (or something like that) it would give an incorrect answer.
The letter stated, that if I could not "live" with this error, I could take it to my local HP center and they could change out the ROM chip with the corrected algorithm, at no charge. That I did as the HP center was just up the road in Dallas, from where I worked in Dallas. The ROM was swapped out and HP also changed the slider/button on the On-Off switch to designate the update. This new sliding button was only fractionally higher. Kretsh Ex-Texas Instrument Employee 1971-1974 |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - Matt Agajanian - 09-07-2022, 11:16 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - teenix - 09-08-2022, 11:36 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - AndiGer - 09-09-2022, 03:33 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - RMollov - 09-09-2022, 06:25 AM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - teenix - 09-09-2022, 08:00 AM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - pauln - 09-09-2022, 05:00 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - AndiGer - 09-09-2022, 06:46 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - Didier Lachieze - 09-09-2022, 08:13 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - Kretsh - 09-10-2022 12:23 AM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - CY-CL - 09-10-2022, 06:18 AM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - EdS2 - 09-10-2022, 07:43 AM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - Didier Lachieze - 09-10-2022, 01:04 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)