The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug
|
09-10-2022, 01:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-10-2022 04:31 PM by Didier Lachieze.)
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug
I'm back home and have checked my Virtual Collection.
(09-10-2022 07:43 AM)EdS2 Wrote: The archived site of the late Jacques Laporte says this:This is confirmed by appendix D of Remembering the HP 35A, in particular Fig. D4 & D5. So assuming that all units prior to the date code 1302A were produced with the bug, this represents at least 77194 units (39071 1143A + 24776 1230A + 13347 1249A). This assumption is confirmed by the highest serial number with the bug in my virtual collection: 1249A 11780. If, when the bug was discovered, there was 25000 units already produced*, this should have been in late August 1972. I have in my Virtual collection 568 units with date code 1143A, 1230A or 1249A. 120 confirmed with the bug, 53 confirmed without the bug and 395 unknown. So based on this small sample 69% of the units with a known status have the bug and 31% don't have it. This would indicate that a lot of the units recalled were not sent back to HP, 31% of 77194 represents 23930 units returned to HP. Now for the Red Dot units, merging my database and the one from http://hp35.wz.cz/ (which I didn't so far to ensure that my collection methodology would be the same for Red Dot and non Red Dot units and to avoid an over-sampling of Red Dots) I come to these numbers:
*this 25000 number is floating around on the internet, but I’ve never seen any historical evidence from HP internal documents. So if someone can provide such evidence I would be more than interested. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - Matt Agajanian - 09-07-2022, 11:16 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - teenix - 09-08-2022, 11:36 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - AndiGer - 09-09-2022, 03:33 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - RMollov - 09-09-2022, 06:25 AM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - teenix - 09-09-2022, 08:00 AM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - pauln - 09-09-2022, 05:00 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - AndiGer - 09-09-2022, 06:46 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - Didier Lachieze - 09-09-2022, 08:13 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - Kretsh - 09-10-2022, 12:23 AM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - CY-CL - 09-10-2022, 06:18 AM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - EdS2 - 09-10-2022, 07:43 AM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - Didier Lachieze - 09-10-2022 01:04 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)