Post Reply 
(15C) Haversine Navigation
11-06-2022, 11:46 PM
Post: #4
RE: (15C) Haversine Navigation
(11-06-2022 05:14 PM)C.Ret Wrote:  If I understand all this correctly, the final multiplication by 60 gives the displacement in nautical miles.
This is correct.

From Nautical mile:
Quote:Historically, it was defined as the meridian arc length corresponding to one minute (\(\frac{1}{60}\) of a degree) of latitude.
While not exactly 1852m it is probably close enough.

[Image: attachment.php?aid=11362]

Even though I've never used this calculator the program is quite readable.
Both →REC and →POL appear to use infix notation which is rather unusual.

Here's what I came up with for the HP-48:
Code:
\<< \-> \Gh1 \Gl1 \Gh2 \Gl2
    \<< 1 \Gl2 \Gl1 - 0 ACOS \Gh2 -
        SPHERE \->V3 RECT V\->
        \-> u v w
        \<< w  u \->V2
            SPHERE V\-> \Gh1 + \->V2
            RECT V\-> v SWAP \->V3
            SPHERE V\-> RECT
        \>>
    \>> ROT DROP 60 *
\>>

Since the latitude is measured from the north-pole we have to calculate the complement \(c = 90^{\circ} - \theta_2\).
And then the transformation between spherical and rectangular coordinates seems a bit awkward.
Thus I'm not super happy with it.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
(15C) Haversine Navigation - SlideRule - 11-12-2019, 12:55 AM
RE: (15C) Haversine Navigation - Thomas Klemm - 11-06-2022 11:46 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)