Roots of Complex Numbers (Sharp, TI, Casio)

[Matt Agajanian]

(01-02-2023 08:47 AM)Thomas Klemm Wrote:  

(01-01-2023 10:03 PM)Matt Agajanian Wrote:  Correct?

This looks good to me.
But now both blocks became identical.

You could use variables \(x\) and \(y\) instead of \(a\) and \(b\) if that helps for readability.
And another variable \(n\) for the exponent instead of \(4\):

R>Pr(x, y)^n sto r
R>PΘ(x, y)*n sto t
P>Rx(r, t)
P>Ry(r, t)

Now you can use it for any of these cases:

• \(n = 4\)
• \(n = -4\)
• \(n = \frac{1}{4}\)
  

My goof.

I mean to say

P>Rx(a, b)^4 sto r
P>Ry(a, b)*4 sto t
P>Rx(r, t)
P>Ry(r, t)

for the second example. Anyway, thanks for the catch all process. Yeah, even though my samples were specific values, it was just making an example.