Roots of Complex Numbers (Sharp, TI, Casio)

[Matt Agajanian]

(01-02-2023 08:47 AM)Thomas Klemm Wrote:  

(01-01-2023 10:03 PM)Matt Agajanian Wrote:  Correct?

This looks good to me.
But now both blocks became identical.

You could use variables \(x\) and \(y\) instead of \(a\) and \(b\) if that helps for readability.
And another variable \(n\) for the exponent instead of \(4\):

R->Pr(x, y)^n sto r
R->PΘ(x, y)*n sto t
P->Rx(r, t)
P->Ry(r, t)

Now you can use it for any of these cases:

• \(n = 4\)
• \(n = -4\)
• \(n = \frac{1}{4}\)
  

Sorry for the double-post. Another thought.

When I use this method for P->R, is it


P->Rx(r, Θ)^n sto r
P->Ry(x, Θ)*n sto t
R->Pr(r, t)
R->Pθ(r, t)

or

r^n STO a
θ*n STO b
P->Rx(a,b)
P->Ry(a,b)


?