The HP-33E/C that could have been.
|
01-06-2023, 04:59 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-06-2023 05:59 AM by Matt Agajanian.)
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
The HP-33E/C that could have been.
Given TI’s SR-56 was a direct competitor to the HP-25, it came complete with 100 program steps. So, wouldn’t it have been more relevant to create an enhanced version of the 25C with 100 program steps instead of 49? And yes, I realize the 29C was the equivalent of the SR-56. Although, as its purpose was to be an economical programmable upgrade from the 25, wouldn't it have been much more significant for the 33 to have 98 or 99 program steps?
But was a model with over 100 program steps what the 34C was for? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-06-2023 04:59 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - brouhaha - 01-06-2023, 06:27 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - lvt - 01-06-2023, 07:43 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Garth Wilson - 01-06-2023, 08:48 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Kostas Kritsilas - 01-07-2023, 03:37 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-07-2023, 06:03 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - brouhaha - 01-07-2023, 06:20 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Kostas Kritsilas - 01-07-2023, 09:19 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-07-2023, 07:45 PM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-07-2023, 07:49 PM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Steve Simpkin - 01-07-2023, 08:21 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)